OPRAH'S STATEMENT: "The item in today's Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show.

 

Oprah's staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

 

"Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on," an insider explains. "Oprah's website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama."

 

One executive close to Winfrey is warning any Palin ban could ignite a dramatic backlash!

 

Link

I hope her show gets canceled! I know it won't happen but oh well! This is her first backing of a presidential nominee! Go figure!

Probably because Gov. Fargo isn't allowed to talk to the press or do interviews. So the point is moot.

Probably because Gov. Fargo isn't allowed to talk to the press or do interviews. So the point is moot.

You must really fear her. :lol:

You must really fear her. :lol:

 

Naw...she won't be around long enough to fear. Come November it will be Sarah who?

I think it's actually a little impressive. Oprah is sticking by her candidate instead of going for an obvious huge ratings opportunity. And I really dislike Oprah.

I think it's actually a little impressive. Oprah is sticking by her candidate instead of going for an obvious huge ratings opportunity. And I really dislike Oprah.

I think it looks cowardly, like she's afraid it will help the McCain campaign.

Naw...she won't be around long enough to fear. Come November it will be Sarah who?

Awful close race to be acting so sure.

You must really fear her. :lol:

 

I've been thinking the exact same thing. I didn't think a vp slot could have such an effect on both parties. Interesting.

I think it looks cowardly, like she's afraid it will help the McCain campaign.

 

 

 

She's made her allegiances known. She's taken a side. She's never pretended to be unbiased. She is not a "news" show. She's the private owner of a business, and she chooses not to host a certain guest. If she owned a restaurant, she'd legally be able to refuse service to anyone she chooses.

OPRAH'S STATEMENT: "The item in today's Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show.

 

Oprah's staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

 

"Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on," an insider explains. "Oprah's website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama."

 

One executive close to Winfrey is warning any Palin ban could ignite a dramatic backlash!

 

Link

 

Drudge? LOL....You do know Opra denies this, don't you?

So much for the Democrats beloved Fairness Doctrine.

Drudge? LOL....You do know Opra denies this, don't you?

Ummm... Did you not read the FIRST LINE I POSTED?

 

The question mark in the thread title might of been a hint for you as well.

She's made her allegiances known. She's taken a side. She's never pretended to be unbiased. She is not a "news" show. She's the private owner of a business, and she chooses not to host a certain guest. If she owned a restaurant, she'd legally be able to refuse service to anyone she chooses.

 

Not on the basis of race, sex, creed, color, religion, disability or national origin.

She's made her allegiances known. She's taken a side. She's never pretended to be unbiased. She is not a "news" show. She's the private owner of a business, and she chooses not to host a certain guest. If she owned a restaurant, she'd legally be able to refuse service to anyone she chooses.

Well duh. :lol:

 

It still makes her look cowardly IMO if it's true.