Lakers are 7-0 at home in the playoffs. Spurs are 6-0 at home. Neither team has showed they can be beat at home. The Lakers have been the better team on the road though. They'll get atleast one in S.A.

 

Spurs have all the experience, but they're also getting old. I'll take a Kobe Bryant led team over the Spurs experience.

 

The Spurs also won't get 4 days of rest in between games 6 and 7 this time either if it goes that far. Something to think about.

 

The Lakers have a better road record in the playoffs, but they've played weaker opponents. The Spurs won a game in Phoenix and one in New Orleans. I think those two road wins are bigger than any of LA's road playoff wins because they came against better teams.

 

The Spurs didn't get much rest between games 2 and 3, and look what happened. This series is far from over. I will not be surprised no matter what the out come is. The winner of this series, wins the championship IMO.

The Lakers have a better road record in the playoffs, but they've played weaker opponents. The Spurs won a game in Phoenix and one in New Orleans. I think those two road wins are bigger than any of LA's road playoff wins because they came against better teams.

 

The Spurs didn't get much rest between games 2 and 3, and look what happened. This series is far from over. I will not be surprised no matter what the out come is. The winner of this series, wins the championship IMO.

 

Didn't the Lakers have to win on the road against the team with the best home record in the NBA to get to the conference finals? Just making sure. Again, you say the Lakers opponents were weak but yet L.A had a better record against the Spurs first two round opponents than the Spurs did against the Lakers first two round opponents? You should really do a little more research before getting on here and calling other teams opponents weak.

 

And the Spurs didn't get much rest in between game 2 and 3, but they were also playing on their home court. It's much easier to prepare for a game at home in one day than it is to prepare for a game 7 on the road, having only one day of rest instead of 4.

 

And I never said the series was over. But I do agree the winner of this series wins the championship.

Didn't the Lakers have to win on the road against the team with the best home record in the NBA to get to the conference finals? Just making sure. Again, you say the Lakers opponents were weak but yet L.A had a better record against the Spurs first two round opponents than the Spurs did against the Lakers first two round opponents? You should really do a little more research before getting on here and calling other teams opponents weak.

 

And the Spurs didn't get much rest in between game 2 and 3, but they were also playing on their home court. It's much easier to prepare for a game at home in one day than it is to prepare for a game 7 on the road, having only one day of rest instead of 4.

 

And I never said the series was over. But I do agree the winner of this series wins the championship.

 

Well said!:thumb:

Didn't the Lakers have to win on the road against the team with the best home record in the NBA to get to the conference finals? Just making sure. Again, you say the Lakers opponents were weak but yet L.A had a better record against the Spurs first two round opponents than the Spurs did against the Lakers first two round opponents? You should really do a little more research before getting on here and calling other teams opponents weak.

 

And the Spurs didn't get much rest in between game 2 and 3, but they were also playing on their home court. It's much easier to prepare for a game at home in one day than it is to prepare for a game 7 on the road, having only one day of rest instead of 4.

 

And I never said the series was over. But I do agree the winner of this series wins the championship.

 

:flame: :flame: :flame: :flame:

Didn't the Lakers have to win on the road against the team with the best home record in the NBA to get to the conference finals? Just making sure. Again, you say the Lakers opponents were weak but yet L.A had a better record against the Spurs first two round opponents than the Spurs did against the Lakers first two round opponents? You should really do a little more research before getting on here and calling other teams opponents weak.

 

And the Spurs didn't get much rest in between game 2 and 3, but they were also playing on their home court. It's much easier to prepare for a game at home in one day than it is to prepare for a game 7 on the road, having only one day of rest instead of 4.

 

And I never said the series was over. But I do agree the winner of this series wins the championship.

 

Says the guy who consistently messes up when discussing the Spurs. You shouldn't call other people out for their lack of research when you mess up your own from time to time. I remember you forgetting or completely not knowing a couple of things concerning the Spurs.

 

The Jazz may have had the best home record in the NBA, but that doesn't mean they were playing great at home in the playoffs. The Rockets beat them at home once during their series too. The Spurs have looked darn near unstoppable at home for most of the playoffs winning by an average of 16 ppg.

 

The short rest might hurt the Spurs if there is a game 7. I'm not denying that. I'm just saying I don't think that will be the deciding factor. The Spurs are a championship type team and they should play that way if a game 7 does occur.

Listen, it's not like we're saying the Lakers are the worst team to have ever been in the playoffs? You all make it sound like we're dogging the Lakers or something. They get their credit and what not. But you all make it sound like the Spurs have never won a championship or a game for that matter. I mean really the Spurs are a dynasty team what not give them their credit.

Listen, it's not like we're saying the Lakers are the worst team to have ever been in the playoffs? You all make it sound like we're dogging the Lakers or something. They get their credit and what not. But you all make it sound like the Spurs have never won a championship or a game for that matter. I mean really the Spurs are a dynasty team what not give them their credit.

 

Credit for what? Winning all those championships? Of course they get their credit for that but we're just saying, they have a slim chance at doing it this season.

Credit for what? Winning all those championships? Of course they get their credit for that but we're just saying, they have a slim chance at doing it this season.

 

Why? If they win tomorrow it'll be tied at 2. I mean you are quick to write them off. A slim chance is better than no chance because Boston had a slim to none chance of beating the Yankees but came back from a 3-0 deficit to win in game 7 on the road.

 

Anything is possible and the Lakers didn't go undefeated at home so they are beatable. As well as the Spurs didn't go undeafeated on the road either..I know!

Why? If they win tomorrow it'll be tied at 2. I mean you are quick to write them off. A slim chance is better than no chance because Boston had a slim to none chance of beating the Yankees but came back from a 3-0 deficit to win in game 7 on the road.

 

Anything is possible and the Lakers didn't go undefeated at home so they are beatable. As well as the Spurs didn't go undeafeated on the road either..I know!

 

They have a slim chance because they are down 2-1. I didn't say they did not have a chance, I said they have a slim one. What's wrong with that? Do they not have a slimmer chance at winning the series right now than the Lakers???? They are down in the series so the answer to that question at this time is Yes.

Credit for what? Winning all those championships? Of course they get their credit for that but we're just saying, they have a slim chance at doing it this season.

 

A slim chance? If being in the final four with, only down 2 games to 1 with 4 games to go in the series coming off a 20 point beat down win over LA is slim...:lol:

They have a slim chance because they are down 2-1. I didn't say they did not have a chance, I said they have a slim one. What's wrong with that? Do they not have a slimmer chance at winning the series right now than the Lakers???? They are down in the series so the answer to that question at this time is Yes.

 

Slimmer than the Lakers at this point is obvious. The Lakers still have home court advantage in the series and a 1 game lead. But that doesn't mean they have a "slim" chance. I'd say they got a really good chance of winning the title this year.

Says the guy who consistently messes up when discussing the Spurs. You shouldn't call other people out for their lack of research when you mess up your own from time to time. I remember you forgetting or completely not knowing a couple of things concerning the Spurs.

 

The Jazz may have had the best home record in the NBA, but that doesn't mean they were playing great at home in the playoffs. The Rockets beat them at home once during their series too. The Spurs have looked darn near unstoppable at home for most of the playoffs winning by an average of 16 ppg.

 

The short rest might hurt the Spurs if there is a game 7. I'm not denying that. I'm just saying I don't think that will be the deciding factor. The Spurs are a championship type team and they should play that way if a game 7 does occur.

 

And the Lakers have looked even better at home during the playoffs winning by an average of 17 ppg...:lol:

Listen, it's not like we're saying the Lakers are the worst team to have ever been in the playoffs? You all make it sound like we're dogging the Lakers or something. They get their credit and what not. But you all make it sound like the Spurs have never won a championship or a game for that matter. I mean really the Spurs are a dynasty team what not give them their credit.

 

That goes both ways...the Spurs fans on here do the same thing.

That goes both ways...the Spurs fans on here do the same thing.

 

BIG TIME.

That goes both ways...the Spurs fans on here do the same thing.

 

I don't believe so.

 

 

They Lakers haven't won a championship since Shaq left, the Spurs have. So it's obvious to defend the DEFENDING NBA CHAMPS. I have given the Lakers credit as well as giving Kobe creddit. I said from the start it was going to be a good series no matter who won. But it seems that no one remembers that the Spurs won a championship with those same players last year.