October 19, 200718 yr Look, we all know politics are ugly. However, its disappointing when its one of "your own" and it involves such an ugly story about going after a family. I'm disappointed in Sen. McConnell. http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071018/OPINION01/710180358
October 19, 200718 yr Big deal. Keep in mind that it is a C-J editorial. Making it an automatic lie as well, I suppose.
October 19, 200718 yr Author Big deal. Keep in mind that it is a C-J editorial. So a newspaper's editorial on an event somehow makes the event(lie) irrelevant? You're not bothered by the fact that the Senator and his staff set out to nail a family simply because they were in an ad that the Senator's party was against? Are we that spiteful as a society?
October 19, 200718 yr Rather than going after the kid and his family (an ad hominem fallacy), why not simply say, "this bill is an unaffordable expansion of entitlement spending"?
October 19, 200718 yr So a newspaper's editorial on an event somehow makes the event(lie) irrelevant? You're not bothered by the fact that the Senator and his staff set out to nail a family simply because they were in an ad that the Senator's party was against? Are we that spiteful as a society? Actually the family allowed themselves to be inserted into the politics of the whole mess by agreeing to allow their son to do the weekly Democratic radio address.
October 20, 200718 yr Kingfish is right. It's genuinely scary how many people believe something just because it's in a newpaper... as if newspapers are entirely objective and honest in their reporting. The C-J makes the Herald Leader look like the John Birch Society newsletter.
October 20, 200718 yr Actually the family allowed themselves to be inserted into the politics of the whole mess by agreeing to allow their son to do the weekly Democratic radio address. The old "they made themselves part of the debate" argument, eh? That seems to be a typical excuse for justifying very personal attacks on people who probably believe they are speaking up for something important. Great message to send, by the way--stand up for something you think is important and get personally smeared by the opposition because they lack the faculties to make a substantive argument. Anybody who thinks this is an acceptable way to conduct political dialogue deserves the quality of government we have.
October 20, 200718 yr Kingfish is right. It's genuinely scary how many people believe something just because it's in a newpaper... as if newspapers are entirely objective and honest in their reporting. The C-J makes the Herald Leader look like the John Birch Society newsletter. What's subject to interpretation here? McConnell's own communications director admitted that they provided reporters with erroneous information regarding the family's background before they established that "they were legit" (his words). He also stated out that he had told this to McConnell the day before Mitch denied his office was involved to a WHAS reporter. Before you label the C-J liars because they reported what McConnell's own communications director had told them, maybe you should stop and consider what McConnell has shown himself to be...
October 20, 200718 yr Before you label the C-J liars because they reported what McConnell's own communications director had told them, maybe you should stop and consider what McConnell has shown himself to be...Liars is a bit strong... liberal hacks with a socialist agenda that leap to point out the flaws of conservatives while turning a blind eye to those who share their views would be more like it... :lol: :lol: :lol: But because they espouse your viewpoint I suppose it's okay eh?
October 20, 200718 yr Anybody who thinks this is an acceptable way to conduct political dialogue deserves the quality of government we have.Kinda like Harry Reid smearing Rush Limbaugh right? :lol: :lol: :lol:
October 20, 200718 yr Kinda like Harry Reid smearing Rush Limbaugh right? :lol: :lol: :lol: If you think I approve of the childish sandbox either of these clowns play in, you're sorely mistaken.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.