September 30, 200718 yr was really funny watching the kicker do the chomp after making it for the 2nd time :thumb::thumb:
September 30, 200718 yr As far as "stunts" and "cheating" goes, let me ask this: How was the kicker hurt by this action? If you're going to use those words, you had better be able to point to the negative impact it has on the kicker or the team.
September 30, 200718 yr As far as "stunts" and "cheating" goes, let me ask this: How was the kicker hurt by this action? If you're going to use those words, you had better be able to point to the negative impact it has on the kicker or the team. Not true. Just because cheating didn't work doesn't mean it wasn't wrong. [don't forget, we are now talking about the priciple of cheating vs. it's actual results. We are not now talking about whether THIS instance was, in fact, cheating]
September 30, 200718 yr Not true. Just because cheating didn't work doesn't mean it wasn't wrong. Yeah. I mean the poor kicker has to do his job twice in a row. Brutal. Or not...
September 30, 200718 yr Not true. Just because cheating didn't work doesn't mean it wasn't wrong. That's a different argument. Some are saying Urban Meyer cheated. I'm asking how he cheated and what was the negative impact or potential negative impact.
September 30, 200718 yr I can't wait for the day when the kicker misses the "Timeout kick" and then makes the next one. When in kicking formation... defense can't call a timeout with the playclock under 10, that is my solution.
September 30, 200718 yr I can't wait for the day when the kicker misses the "Timeout kick" and then makes the next one. That would be great! :lol:
September 30, 200718 yr As far as "stunts" and "cheating" goes, let me ask this: How was the kicker hurt by this action? If you're going to use those words, you had better be able to point to the negative impact it has on the kicker or the team.Because it's a psychological barrier. If he makes a difficult kick, he's forced to replicate the kick. If he misses it, he's going to have that in the back of his mind. The point is, no team should be forced to produce a successful outcome twice in a row, unless they are at fault in some way.
September 30, 200718 yr Because it's a psychological barrier. If he makes a difficult kick, he's forced to replicate the kick. If he misses it, he's going to have that in the back of his mind. The point is, no team should be forced to produce a successful outcome twice in a row, unless they are at fault in some way. Give me a break. The kid is getting a FREE education to make kicks. Weak...
September 30, 200718 yr Give me a break. The kid is getting a FREE education to make kicks. Weak...That doesn't make a bit of sense. :lol:
September 30, 200718 yr That doesn't make a bit of sense. :lol: If the TO is called before the snap it's like any other game situation. The kicker is almost always on scholarship and is getting a free education to put the ball through the uprights. The uproar over this rule is a joke...
September 30, 200718 yr If the TO is called before the snap it's like any other game situation. The kicker is almost always on scholarship and is getting a free education to put the ball through the uprights. The uproar over this rule is a joke... "Sorry young man, I'm going to give you a 15 yard penalty, just because the oposing coach asked me to. Now that shouldn't bother you--remember, you are on a scholarship!
September 30, 200718 yr Are you a Florida fan BF???Not exactly. :lol: Actually, I have no preference for either team. Just didn't like the low-brow coaching ploy.
September 30, 200718 yr "Sorry young man, I'm going to give you a 15 yard penalty, just because the oposing coach asked me to. Now that shouldn't bother you--remember, you are on a scholarship! You are reaching BIG TIME. Should a D not be allowed to call a TO right before the snap if they notice a bad mismatch? It's not fair to the O that created the opportunity right? Weak BF. Really weak...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.