Elliott does it again on the mound . They tried to get through the 7th with the soph who pitched well vs Indians in the Doc Morris but had to bring him back in to close it .I would like to know what his ERA is .I think his only loss is to Dunbar where errors cost the Tigers 5 unearned enroute to a 5-1 loss at Dunbar .

They have to have the youngest L/U in the state with a above .500 record .Playing 8th graders ,freshman and sophs on a regular basis along with the very good JRS. :thumb:

okay so who is the one seed now?

Evidentally Beechwood has to beat Holmes and CCH to make a 3-way tie. Does that make HC the 1 right now? If that's the case there's this...

 

5) In the case of a three-way tie for the district winning

position, the tie would be resolved in the following

manner. If any of the tie-breakers results in one of the

teams being ahead of the other two, the tie is broken.

If any of the tie-breakers result in two teams remaining

ahead of the third, then the two-way tie breaker shall be

used to determine the winner between those two.

a) The tie-breaking mechanisms (in order) shall be:

i) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the second game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

ii) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the first game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

iii) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the

total points allowed in all seeded games shall be the

next tie-breaker.

iv) If the tie remains between all three teams, then

the total points allowed in the second of each of the

seeded games shall be the next tie-breaker.

v) If the tie is still unbreakable, then a blind draw among

the three teams shall break the tie.

b) Additional tie-breaking mechanisms could be added,

and would be uniform for all three-team districts.

Evidentally Beechwood has to beat Holmes and CCH to make a 3-way tie. Does that make HC the 1 right now? If that's the case there's this...

 

5) In the case of a three-way tie for the district winning

position, the tie would be resolved in the following

manner. If any of the tie-breakers results in one of the

teams being ahead of the other two, the tie is broken.

If any of the tie-breakers result in two teams remaining

ahead of the third, then the two-way tie breaker shall be

used to determine the winner between those two.

a) The tie-breaking mechanisms (in order) shall be:

i) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the second game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

ii) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the first game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

iii) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the

total points allowed in all seeded games shall be the

next tie-breaker.

iv) If the tie remains between all three teams, then

the total points allowed in the second of each of the

seeded games shall be the next tie-breaker.

v) If the tie is still unbreakable, then a blind draw among

the three teams shall break the tie.

b) Additional tie-breaking mechanisms could be added,

 

and would be uniform for all three-team districts.

 

If beechwood beats holmes and Cov. Cath they get the 1 seed because they would be undefeated in districts, if Cov. Cath beats the Beechies then there is where the 3 way tie would come in place.

If beechwood beats holmes and Cov. Cath they get the 1 seed because they would be undefeated in districts, if Cov. Cath beats the Beechies then there is where the 3 way tie would come in place.

 

Correct, my bad...

Who pitched or won for Beechwood?

I think Elliot.

If beechwood beats holmes and Cov. Cath they get the 1 seed because they would be undefeated in districts, if Cov. Cath beats the Beechies then there is where the 3 way tie would come in place.

 

 

This is correct. Elliott did pitch against HC and will throw Wed against CCH.

Evidentally Beechwood has to beat Holmes and CCH to make a 3-way tie. Does that make HC the 1 right now? If that's the case there's this...

 

5) In the case of a three-way tie for the district winning

position, the tie would be resolved in the following

manner. If any of the tie-breakers results in one of the

teams being ahead of the other two, the tie is broken.

If any of the tie-breakers result in two teams remaining

ahead of the third, then the two-way tie breaker shall be

used to determine the winner between those two.

a) The tie-breaking mechanisms (in order) shall be:

i) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the second game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

ii) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the first game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

iii) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the

total points allowed in all seeded games shall be the

next tie-breaker.

iv) If the tie remains between all three teams, then

the total points allowed in the second of each of the

seeded games shall be the next tie-breaker.

v) If the tie is still unbreakable, then a blind draw among

the three teams shall break the tie.

b) Additional tie-breaking mechanisms could be added,

and would be uniform for all three-team districts.

 

Sticky where did you get this tiebreaker information? Is this standard?

Sticky where did you get this tiebreaker information? Is this standard?

 

KHSAA

 

There's actually a two team and a three team scenario...

On a side note, with my 'sticky mitts' and your 'butter fingers' you are officially my BGP nemesis...

Sticky where did you get this tiebreaker information? Is this standard?

Look at item IV, to the link below. Typically, the coaches within the District, have on file an "approved Seeding plan", which coincides with the KHSAA minimum requirements.

 

http://www.khsaa.org/baseball/appendixatournamentrules.pdf

5) In the case of a three-way tie for the district winning

position, the tie would be resolved in the following

manner. If any of the tie-breakers results in one of the

teams being ahead of the other two, the tie is broken.

If any of the tie-breakers result in two teams remaining

ahead of the third, then the two-way tie breaker shall be

used to determine the winner between those two.

a) The tie-breaking mechanisms (in order) shall be:

i) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the second game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

ii) If the tie remains between all three teams, the

record in the first game played against all district

opponents involved in the tie.

iii) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the

total points allowed in all seeded games shall be the

next tie-breaker.

iv) If the tie remains between all three teams, then

the total points allowed in the second of each of the

seeded games shall be the next tie-breaker.

v) If the tie is still unbreakable, then a blind draw among

the three teams shall break the tie.

b) Additional tie-breaking mechanisms could be added,

and would be uniform for all three-team districts.

 

According to the link given by strike three the above tiebreakers are only for a three way tie in a district with three teams. A seeding plan for a four team district must be agreed upon by the coaches/principals of the schools, therefore this seeding plan does not necessarily apply

I'm not a big Myerhoff guy due to some of his antics but I must admit that he's done a great job with this particular bunch.

I see an Elliott/Blesser match up on Wed. If Beechwood can pull another upset they will be the undisputed #1 seed in the district, no tiebreakers necessary.

I see an Elliott/Blesser match up on Wed. If Beechwood can pull another upset they will be the undisputed #1 seed in the district, no tiebreakers necessary.

 

Upset? Looks like a well played wild-card to me.