April 2, 200719 yr No. Some of the "elite" teams record's over the past 10 seasons: Duke 302-52 (.853) 1 title Kansas 274-71 (.787) 0 titles Kentucky 262-82 (.762) 1 title North Carolina 236-100 (.702) 1 title Louisville 203-119 (.630) 0 titles Indiana 198-121 (.621) 0 titles Kentucky does have a title in the past ten years. But that doesn't make them elite in that time period. W-L is not what makes teams elite in college basketball. Like it or not, production in March is the measuring stick. This sport revolves around the Final Four. Like I said earlier in this thread, the elite teams of the past ten years would best be measured by teams with multiple Final Four appearances. That counts out Louisville, Indiana, and Kentucky, but counts in teams like Florida, Maryland, and UConn.
April 2, 200719 yr Kentucky does have a title in the past ten years. But that doesn't make them elite in that time period. W-L is not what makes teams elite in college basketball. Like it or not, production in March is the measuring stick. This sport revolves around the Final Four. Like I said earlier in this thread, the elite teams of the past ten years would best be measured by teams with multiple Final Four appearances. That counts out Louisville, Indiana, and Kentucky, but counts in teams like Florida, Maryland, and UConn. I guess that is why some friends of mine who are Kansas fans think that Bill Self has been a failure at Kansas. I think the season along with tournament performance should determine if the season was a success or not. The final four is great, but after a year or so, I cannot remember who the other final four teams were besides the champion.
April 2, 200719 yr I guess that is why some friends of mine who are Kansas fans think that Bill Self has been a failure at Kansas. I think the season along with tournament performance should determine if the season was a success or not. The final four is great, but after a year or so, I cannot remember who the other final four teams were besides the champion. Bill Self has never been to the Final Four at Kansas.
April 2, 200719 yr Kentucky does have a title in the past ten years. But that doesn't make them elite in that time period. W-L is not what makes teams elite in college basketball. Like it or not, production in March is the measuring stick. This sport revolves around the Final Four. Like I said earlier in this thread, the elite teams of the past ten years would best be measured by teams with multiple Final Four appearances. That counts out Louisville, Indiana, and Kentucky, but counts in teams like Florida, Maryland, and UConn. So you're saying championships don't mean anything, just Final 4 appearances?
April 2, 200719 yr So you're saying championships don't mean anything, just Final 4 appearances?Sure they matter. But there's not a big difference in the prestige of winning the whole shooting match and making the Final Four. Just like there's not a big perceived prestige difference between making the Elite Eight and the Sweet Sixteen. But look at the gap of prestige between making the Elite Eight and the Final Four: Tubby made the Elite Eight as consistantly as anybody, but without Final Four appearances UK fans were completely unsatisfied. I admit that it's kind of funny, but it's how it is in college basketball. Every sport has different standards. In pro baseball, winning the division is considered a successful season for just about any club. But in pro football, it's not nearly as great a prize.
April 2, 200719 yr Bill Self has never been to the Final Four at Kansas. I know that he has not been to a final four, this was the first year that he has made it out of the first weekend of the tournament. They tell me that a lot of the Kansas fans want to cut him loose, but that the majority want to give him another year. It seems as bad or worse than the UK situation to me.
April 2, 200719 yr Sure they matter. But there's not a big difference in the prestige of winning the whole shooting match and making the Final Four. Just like there's not a big perceived prestige difference between making the Elite Eight and the Sweet Sixteen. But look at the gap of prestige between making the Elite Eight and the Final Four: Tubby made the Elite Eight as consistantly as anybody, but without Final Four appearances UK fans were completely unsatisfied. I admit that it's kind of funny, but it's how it is in college basketball. Every sport has different standards. In pro baseball, winning the division is considered a successful season for just about any club. But in pro football, it's not nearly as great a prize. I believe that most UK fans are more upset at not making the sweet 16 the past two years in addition to not beating any ranked opponents at all this year. It was starting to look as though UT as well as Florida were bypassing UK in the SEC and there did not seem to be a lot of help on the way for the Cats. I hated to see Tubby leave the way he did, but it was best for him and the program as both had grown stagnant.
April 2, 200719 yr I know that he has not been to a final four, this was the first year that he has made it out of the first weekend of the tournament. They tell me that a lot of the Kansas fans want to cut him loose, but that the majority want to give him another year. It seems as bad or worse than the UK situation to me. Actually this was Self's 2nd Elite 8 in four years at Kansas and 4th of his career( 1 at Tulsa, 1 at Illinois). I'd take him at UK in a minute he can flat out recruit.
April 2, 200719 yr I believe that most UK fans are more upset at not making the sweet 16 the past two years in addition to not beating any ranked opponents at all this year. It was starting to look as though UT as well as Florida were bypassing UK in the SEC and there did not seem to be a lot of help on the way for the Cats. I hated to see Tubby leave the way he did, but it was best for him and the program as both had grown stagnant. Which is the difference between adequacy and success. If UK made the Sweet 16 the past two years, Kentucky fans are still unsatisfied, but there aren't constant 'Scrub the Tub' threads.
April 2, 200719 yr Which is the difference between adequacy and success. If UK made the Sweet 16 the past two years, Kentucky fans are still unsatisfied, but there aren't constant 'Scrub the Tub' threads. You're probably right.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.