1 hour ago, theguru said:

Obviously the Elder players are not objective but it was a strong "no good" reaction from them.

My thought as well.

2 hours ago, Jack of all Trades said:

Can someone who had a better view than I confirm the last Highlands field goal was good. The Elder reaction and one official reaction made me think no, but couldn’t tell for sure.

A little birdie close to the action told me it was no good, but I have little else to go on.

The only thing I question is the last series on offense is the play calling by not having Lorenzen involved. I would take my chances with a heavy offensive package with him toting the ball for at least 3 plays from the 5 yard line.

10 hours ago, QBH said:

The only thing I question is the last series on offense is the play calling by not having Lorenzen involved. I would take my chances with a heavy offensive package with him toting the ball for at least 3 plays from the 5 yard line.

Feeling like I am Monday morning QBing, but I can’t help myself agreeing with you. Candidly, I assumed at the time it was #22 time.

2 hours ago, Oldercoach said:

Feeling like I am Monday morning QBing, but I can’t help myself agreeing with you. Candidly, I assumed at the time it was #22 time.

How about at that point in the game you have 1, 7 and 22 in the backfield? Along with 2 that makes you a quadruple threat.

If JOAT will allow me you could add 9 to the list and run option with a nifty QB ( football smart beyond his years ) and have a nice goal line option play in the repertoire. PS I like all 1, 7, 22, 2, and 9. Added 9 because of the outside speed and or pass catching ability.