Can't blame the refs! ACC rules!

But how many did each team get by with? How many impacted the game the way the 2 cheap ones on Fox did?

 

The 2nd one on Fox was his own stupid fault. It was the missed calls that stood out in my mind, not the ones they called.

It's the old NCAA vs UK conspiracy

 

I root for UK but its ridiculous to think these three guys hate UK so much they want to cheat to make sure they lose. Granted, I don't think it has been a well-called game but it's more inept refereeing than it is nefarious refereeing.

The fouls were even at 10 apiece for those playing at home.

 

The amount of fouls that were called, were even, I don't think the amount of fouls that were committed were close to being even.

Yes it does

They aren't rooting for UNC if that's what you are getting at. It's possible they were just bad that half. That's how it works. I figured a know it all would know that.

But how many did each team get by with? How many impacted the game the way the 2 cheap ones on Fox did?

 

They were bad both ways. But only one way matters to you guys.

 

I dont remember Fox's first foul, but his second one was absolutely legit and a stupid play by him.

Uk players are very soft today. Not sure if its still beat up from UCLA game or its just a bad day.

Because they didn't miss any on UK. :lol2: Come on now.

 

I can't think of any that really impacted the game. Did you think that was a good call on the Willis' foul that changed momentum and gave UNC 2 points?

They were bad both ways. But only one way matters to you guys.

 

I dont remember Fox's first foul, but his second one was absolutely legit and a stupid play by him.

 

Yep, very stupid foul my Fox. Not smart basketball.

I agree I don't think it has been well-called. Do you think the refs want UNC to win?

 

Their bosses do. They can't stand the thought of an SEC vs SEC championship after letting 9 ACC teams in the tourney.

Uk players are very soft today. Not sure if its still beat up from UCLA game or its just a bad day.

Ahhh yes the of soft label. Hot takes, everyone get your hot takes.

They were bad both ways. But only one way matters to you guys.

 

I dont remember Fox's first foul, but his second one was absolutely legit and a stupid play by him.

His first was the one where the UNC player plowed over him but Fox was still sliding over. Could have went either way.

I root for UK but its ridiculous to think these three guys hate UK so much they want to cheat to make sure they lose. Granted, I don't think it has been a well-called game but it's more inept refereeing than it is nefarious refereeing.

 

I have only noticed one official who seems to call things UNC's way. UK needs to play better, regardless of officiating to win though.

Their bosses do. They can't stand the thought of an SEC vs SEC championship after letting 9 ACC teams in the tourney.

Come on, do you really believe that?

I can't think of any that really impacted the game. Did you think that was a good call on the Willis' foul that changed momentum and gave UNC 2 points?

 

He was across his arm and wrapped up, so I can easily see why it was called. If UK didn't have a little momentum there, or UK had the ball and UNC made the same play, you wouldn't care about the call.