The 2nd on Willis was pretty bad.

I can't think of any that really impacted the game. Did you think that was a good call on the Willis' foul that changed momentum and gave UNC 2 points?

 

Not a good call in my opinion. I doubt if the referee said, "i'm gonna cheat KY" before he called it, though.

Come on, do you really believe that?

 

You know they do.

They were bad both ways. But only one way matters to you guys.

 

I dont remember Fox's first foul, but his second one was absolutely legit and a stupid play by him.

It's not so much the fouls called although some were really bad like the one on Willis. But the ones that aren't called like everytime Bam

is mugged or the one not called in Fox's drive. Those are the ones I don't understand.

UNC 50% shooting and +5 on boards. Cats must do a better job playing through contact and getting on the boards. Need some inside out looks for Monk as well. If Monk has to put the ball on the floor to create shots we are in trouble. (Need some catch and shoot opportunities)

Their bosses do. They can't stand the thought of an SEC vs SEC championship after letting 9 ACC teams in the tourney.

 

The selection committee is over the head of officials? You learn something new every day!

Also Meeks had a clear over the back on Briscoe late in the half that was also pretty awful.

Their bosses do. They can't stand the thought of an SEC vs SEC championship after letting 9 ACC teams in the tourney.

 

So you think there is a conspiracy coming from the top?

Hmmm Briscoe missing another layup. Go figure.

Briscoe missing more layups.

Ahhh yes the of soft label. Hot takes, everyone get your hot takes.

 

What do you want to call it?

Briscoe you are horrible from point blank

Oh look...

How wasn't Fox fouled??????

Soft let they take the ball right out of their hands.