Who has advocated that? All I said is that a brick is a deadly weapon and those hurling at police officers or civilians should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. People wearing hoods and throwing bricks at people are more worried about being identified than they are about the health and well being of their targets.

 

Pretty sure that wasn't directed at you. Rather at someone else who has consistently hinted and shooting everyone that moves in these riot/protest situations.

Tear gas and pepper spray. Lots of both, then jail time for those they catch rioting. Felony charges for looting, arson, assault etc...

Pretty sure that wasn't directed at you. Rather at someone else who has consistently hinted and shooting everyone that moves in these riot/protest situations.

 

I don't think anyone takes his posts serious. I just see his posts, chuckle and go "there he is." And riot gear is nothing more than catchers equipment.

Here's what some seem to be advocating.

 

 

There's a difference between some and one.

You can't throw bricks at police officers. That's a no no. Anyone with any sense would know you can't throw bricks at police officers. That should be automatic felony.

Here's what some seem to be advocating.

 

 

Exactly what I was thinking.

A buddy of mine sent me this. He thinks the news sources watched by Clinton supporters was the reason they were so upset. They had put the election to bed due to what their own news sources told them. It made it a complete blind sided hit on them.

 

[video=youtube;Ut0TaegQ-kw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut0TaegQ-kw