So that's what those tee shirts are about. How clever, to print them so far in advance of the Highlands game.

 

Well, we've found an area we agree on:They are clever! Smart too - National Merits!!!

So that's what those tee shirts are about. How clever, to print them so far in advance of the Highlands game.

 

Maybe they should have put "unfinished business" on their shirts instead...

Substitute!!!!!!! Nick is in against Oldham Rocks up 49-0 with 6 to go in the 3rd. Enough said.

Sooooo about that Trinity / Southern game?

Substitute!!!!!!! Nick is in against Oldham Rocks up 49-0 with 6 to go in the 3rd. Enough said.

Check your facts. Petrino QBed the first series in the second half (along with all the other starters). I doubt that series took that much time off the clock. The fact is, with the exception of the QB (who quite frankly needs the work) the substitutions were plentiful after the first quarter. By the middle of the second quarter the defense was almost all sophmores. So its not really "enough said", how about let the coaches coach.

Maybe they should have put "unfinished business" on their shirts instead...

I still have one of those, they sure did "finish" that year. 45-19 if I remember correctly.

Well, we've found an area we agree on:They are clever! Smart too - National Merits!!!

Great to find common ground, but as to my point about the shirts in question???

Southern wins in an upset over the Shamrocks 28 - 27!!!!

Listen very carefully LUCK......Crack kills!....get some help...before I see you on an episode of Intervention! :lol:

 

Rocks by a landslide.....

You may be accurate with this specific analysis. I specifically had in mind three games that Trinity lost: 2001 Male v. Trinity(45-19) and X v. Trinity in '06 and '05 (48-16 and 36-18). The substitution statement was the only area I took issue with you. Of course, as noted, Trinity is not behind often, in part because Trinity has a very good coach.

 

I see a 56-14 Rock romp. Good luck.

I don't know how you reference history...but per the rings, banners, etc....I think that Trinity won that game. If I am wrong let me know

You may be accurate with this specific analysis. I specifically had in mind three games that Trinity lost: 2001 Male v. Trinity(45-19) and X v. Trinity in '06 and '05 (48-16 and 36-18). The substitution statement was the only area I took issue with you. Of course, as noted, Trinity is not behind often, in part because Trinity has a very good coach.

 

I see a 56-14 Rock romp. Good luck.

 

Your years are off.

 

Trinity v. Male 2001 Trinity won by a score of 45-19, the previous year we lost to Male 34-14.

 

36-18 was 2004 and 48-16 was 2005.

^ does it ever get old that I beat you on these?

 

 

:lol:

^ does it ever get old that I beat you on these?

 

 

:lol:

 

 

No but if I were grading our responses I would have given yours a lower score because you lacked supporting details. :walk:

AHHHHHH, I provided the CRUX of the point :lol:

We're inside of a week, I can't believe there isn't a thread already. :walk:

 

Is there an unwritten BGP rule that I'm un aware of that says you can't start a game thread until the week of the game?

 

:sssh: Or are the T and X fans just laying low after a much needed hand slapping by Watusi and Guru last week?:sssh:

 

I think I'll go start that thread right now and beat everybody to the punch! Why wait until 9:30 or 10:00 tonight?

 

Good Luck tonight ROCKS!

 

There has been a thread already...

 

 

http://www.bluegrasspreps.com/showthread.php?t=101780&highlight=early+trinity

 

 

AHHHHHH, I provided the CRUX of the point :lol:

 

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: