I would think if I were "party big wig" for either party I'd hope my candidate loses so I can get a legit candidate in 4 years. This seems like one of those elections where one term is a legit possibility. Of course, demographics make it tough on Rs now especially if they keep putting up candidates that stray too far to the right but even that might not stop them from beating HRC in 4 years.

 

Each party needs some serious bench building.

 

I will drink to that, this response brought to you by Bud Light.

Where's @Jesse James when you need him!?

Isn't there a gun issue you are interested in?

 

Why do you have to come into the football forum and talk politics?

 

:lol2: Because some nameless entity decided to "test the waters". Speaking of guns, don't vote Hillary. Vote Pedro.

I'm trying to see what you call close by using numbers. Just saying "close" is so vague it's a waste of bytes.

Why don't you tell me what my opinion and stance should be and I'll just hit the like button. I think it will be a race where we don't know the winner until late. Call it "Close", call it "average" call it "normal" what every you would like. I'm not going to give a margin of victory, that would be a waste of bytes.

Did you miss the part where I said I can't see myself pulling the lever for HRC?

 

Biased media? CNN was the damn official network of Trump and Hannity is his personal errand boy.

You didn't say you wouldn't pull that lever for her though. You said ZERO chance you would vote for Trump. If you said ZERO chance you'd vote for either, I'd agree with you, but...

 

CNN - Clinton News Network

Hannity? Well, duh.

:lol2: Because some nameless entity decided to "test the waters". Speaking of guns, don't vote Hillary. Vote Pedro.

 

They took OUR JOBS!

You didn't say you wouldn't pull that lever for her though. You said ZERO chance you would vote for Trump. If you said ZERO chance you'd vote for either, I'd agree with you, but...

 

CNN - Clinton News Network

Hannity? Well, duh.

 

Is that Riddle Explained?

You didn't say you wouldn't pull that lever for her though. You said ZERO chance you would vote for Trump. If you said ZERO chance you'd vote for either, I'd agree with you, but...

 

CNN - Clinton News Network

Hannity? Well, duh.

 

CNN hired his campaign manager WHILE HE WAS GETTING PAID BY TRUMP. They rode his coattails.

Why don't you tell me what my opinion and stance should be and I'll just hit the like button. I think it will be a race where we don't know the winner until late. Call it "Close", call it "average" call it "normal" what every you would like. I'm not going to give a margin of victory, that would be a waste of bytes.

 

As a vet of BGP you know I couldn't care less what your opinion is. I'm simply asking you to define what you call close. 52/48 300/238? Close in this type of election can cover a wide gamut.

If I was running the DNC I would have to ask, "What in the wide wide world of sports is happening to cause us to lose the state of West Virginia which we already had colored blue?"

They took OUR JOBS!

 

That's South Park, keep up. :lol2:

CNN hired his campaign manager WHILE HE WAS GETTING PAID BY TRUMP. They rode his coattails.

 

Sounds like some coaches I know...

I can't wait till the third debate I think Trump let's the :poop: fly.

As a vet of BGP you know I couldn't care less what your opinion is. I'm simply asking you to define what you call close. 52/48 300/238? Close in this type of election can cover a wide gamut.

@Clyde is calling @Ram out

 

Battle 2016: Clyde vs. Ram

As a vet of BGP you know I couldn't care less what your opinion is. I'm simply asking you to define what you call close. 52/48 300/238? Close in this type of election can cover a wide gamut.

Could you define "Vet"? Is that a member from day one, or more then 10 years, over 5 years? What makes you a "Vet"?