Those WikiLeaks emails must be off the hook.

 

Nothing in them will sway Hillary supporters, nothing.

Is there anything .. anything at all, that HRC will say that cause them to reconsider ? Just how far can she go and maintain her gigantic support ?

Is there anything .. anything at all, that HRC will say that cause them to reconsider ? Just how far can she go and maintain her gigantic support ?

 

 

Don't like her at all, however, she will appoint favorable SCOTUS candidates that are aligned more to my beliefs. Said it from day one, once it was clear who would run. I have no idea who Trump would nominate. Other than that, they both are weak candidates.

Is there anything .. anything at all, that HRC will say that cause them to reconsider ? Just how far can she go and maintain her gigantic support ?

 

 

Don't like her at all, however, she will appoint favorable SCOTUS candidates that are aligned more to my beliefs. Said it from day one, once it was clear who would run. I have no idea who Trump would nominate. Other than that, they both are weak candidates.

 

So what she says does not matter to me, but she won't say too much outlandish and off the scripted stuff.

Don't like her at all, however, she will appoint favorable SCOTUS candidates that are aligned more to my beliefs. Said it from day one, once it was clear who would run. I have no idea who Trump would nominate. Other than that, they both are weak candidates.

 

So what she says does not matter to me, but she won't say too much outlandish and off the scripted stuff.

 

She won't say much of anything, wasent the fox interview on Sunday her first in like 209 days? And she said something dumb, so the least amount of interviews the better

 

I'm not saying that's a bad strategy, heck if you never say anything the media can't run with 24/7.

She won't say much of anything, wasent the fox interview on Sunday her first in like 209 days? And she said something dumb, so the least amount of interviews the better

 

I'm not saying that's a bad strategy, heck if you never say anything the media can't run with 24/7.

 

Great choices--One candidate who won't sit for interviews unless it's staged, because she's knows she'll lie or contradict herself again; and the other who won't shut up saying stupid stuff. Makes you confident in the future of the US!

Great choices--One candidate who won't sit for interviews unless it's staged, because she's knows she'll lie or contradict herself again; and the other who won't shut up saying stupid stuff. Makes you confident in the future of the US!

 

It doesn't hurt to have most of the MSM backing you either. Hillary sure has that. They hammer Trump for every goof, as they should, but give Hillary a pass on her outright lying.

Don't like her at all, however, she will appoint favorable SCOTUS candidates that are aligned more to my beliefs. Said it from day one, once it was clear who would run. I have no idea who Trump would nominate. Other than that, they both are weak candidates.

 

So what she says does not matter to me, but she won't say too much outlandish and off the scripted stuff.

 

What do you want the SCOTUS to do? Legislate from the bench or follow the Constitution?

It doesn't hurt to have most of the MSM backing you either. Hillary sure has that. They hammer Trump for every goof, as they should, but give Hillary a pass on her outright lying.

 

There's no comparison between the two, for sure. By the major barometers (Politifact, for examples) Candidate Trump is in a league of his own.

 

• 
  

If we are to believe the word of the witness here it seems Donald may be infatuated with pushing that "red" button.

What do you want the SCOTUS to do? Legislate from the bench or follow the Constitution?

 

It has been my experience that when a SCOTUS decision goes against someone's beliefs, someone howls "legislating from the bench". Regardless of political stripe.

There's no comparison between the two, for sure. By the major barometers (Politifact, for examples) Candidate Trump is in a league of his own.

 

 

 

 

So Hillary should get a pass on lying because Trump sticks his foot in his mouth more often. Got it. :ohbrother:

It has been my experience that when a SCOTUS decision goes against someone's beliefs, someone howls "legislating from the bench". Regardless of political stripe.

 

That didn't answer the question. My question was what do those on the Left want the SCOTUS to do? What hasn't been done that you want done?

So Hillary should get a pass on lying because Trump sticks his foot in his mouth more often. Got it. :ohbrother:

 

Not at all. Trump lies much more often, hence he should be called out more often. Pretty easy reasoning to follow. Both candidates should be called out when they lie.

That didn't answer the question. My question was what do those on the Left want the SCOTUS to do? What hasn't been done that you want done?

 

 

I'm not on the "left", but as far as what I want the SCOTUS to do is quite simple. I want them to make well-thought out, logical well-reasoned decisions and opinions on the cases they hear. Whether I agree or disagree with the decision is secondary to me. As long as the reasoning is sound, I'm cool with it.