Cal reminds me of another guy in the news everyday. Out of nowhere he brings something up by creating the parameters of the discussion to conveniently inoculate himself. His supporters then cannot hardly believe anyone could take issue with what he says. I'm sure the shift in the local discussion moving on from one of his starter's waking up drunk in a street by his car is only a convenient byproduct.

As for the fake classes at UNC, basketball was cleared. So, there's that.

As for the fake classes at UNC, basketball was cleared. So, there's that.

 

Convenient

Convenient

 

Hey.... I don't make the calls. As a fan, I expected the worst. The NCAA, who is about as corrupt as they come, made the ruling.

Hey.... I don't make the calls. As a fan, I expected the worst. The NCAA, who is about as corrupt as they come, made the ruling.

 

I think thats kind of his point.

I think thats kind of his point.

 

Yep

I think thats kind of his point.

 

I'm aware. Just as he's incriminating himself to everybody but the uk fan base implying he knew at Umass (self imposed) and he knew at Memphis whether he admits that or not.

I'm aware. Just as he's incriminating himself to everybody but the uk fan base implying he knew at Umass (self imposed) and he knew at Memphis whether he admits that or not.

 

I don't know enough details about Marcus Camby, I was to young. But Memphis didn't happen on his campus and it wasn't proven that his assistants were involved. So, how is he incriminating himself?

 

He probably did know about Memphis and UMass. I'm not saying he didn't.

 

But how is he incriminating himself if he said coaches know when it happens on campus and/or assistants are involved, when they neither of those are true to my knowledge in Memphis?

I don't know enough details about Marcus Camby, I was to young. But Memphis didn't happen on his campus and it wasn't proven that his assistants were involved. So, how is he incriminating himself?

 

He probably did know about Memphis and UMass. I'm not saying he didn't.

 

But how is he incriminating himself if he said coaches know when it happens on campus and/or assistants are involved, when they neither of those are true to my knowledge in Memphis?

 

So because it happened off campus is a legit reason he didn't know? You're better than that.

So because it happened off campus is a legit reason he didn't know? You're better than that.

 

Dude...I never said he didn't know lol. In fact I said:

 

 

He probably did know about Memphis and UMass. I'm not saying he didn't.

 

What I don't understand is, how his comment incriminating to himself. He said if it happens on your campus or your assistants are in involved, you probably know about it as the Head Coach.

 

In Derrick Rose situtation, it wasn't on campus and his assistants weren't involved. So how he incriminating himself with that statement? I'm not saying "it's a reason to not know", he probably did. But I don't see how his comment incriminating himself.

MJ, your Blue Blockers are definitely rocking on this one.

I get what MJ's saying.

 

Do I think he probably knew? Absolutely.

 

However, when you say he's incriminating himself by saying what he said, you're saying it either a) happened on the UMASS or Memphis campuses, or b) his assistants were involved. If that were the case, his comments would be self-incriminating. Neither of the incidents happened on the campuses, and as far as what's known, no assistants were involved. That doesn't mean he didn't know about them. It just means his comments don't self-incriminate.

 

I will say it's kinda ironic a coach that has had wins stripped away at two different programs would comment on what a coach is or isn't aware of, but that's a different discussion than what MJ's getting at.

Dude...I never said he didn't know lol. In fact I said:

 

 

 

What I don't understand is, how his comment incriminating to himself. He said if it happens on your campus or your assistants are in involved, you probably know about it as the Head Coach.

 

In Derrick Rose situtation, it wasn't on campus and his assistants weren't involved. So how he incriminating himself with that statement? I'm not saying "it's a reason to not know", he probably did. But I don't see how his comment incriminating himself.

 

So, when Roy sad he didn't know about the fake classes, it's legit? Or Briles not knowing about the sexual assaults because they happened off campus? Take the blue glasses off and clean them, please.

I get what MJ's saying.

 

Do I think he probably knew? Absolutely.

 

However, when you say he's incriminating himself by saying what he said, you're saying it either a) happened on the UMASS or Memphis campuses, or b) his assistants were involved. If that were the case, his comments would be self-incriminating. Neither of the incidents happened on the campuses, and as far as what's known, no assistants were involved. That doesn't mean he didn't know about them. It just means his comments don't self-incriminate.

 

I will say it's kinda ironic a coach that has had wins stripped away at two different programs would comment on what a coach is or isn't aware of, but that's a different discussion than what MJ's getting at.

 

So as long as it doesn't happen on campus then all is good and coaches can't be held responsible? Got it

So as long as it doesn't happen on campus then all is good and coaches can't be held responsible? Got it

 

That's what Cal said. Whether I agree with it or not is irrelevant and isn't the point anyone has tried to make.