February 6, 201610 yr When did I say it would be the dumbest thing Americans have done after being lied to? It most certainly will though. She's dangerous.
February 6, 201610 yr It most certainly will though. She's dangerous. Your probably right, I just don't like the left putting words in my mouth. lol
February 6, 201610 yr It most certainly will though. She's dangerous. Clinton Ominously Tells Iowan Supporters To Mark Front Doors With Campaign Logo Before Sundown - The Onion - America's Finest News Source I think you may be right. :scared:
February 6, 201610 yr Trusting a liberal is like trusting a child sex offender to babysit at a daycare. You just know its wrong. Wow. You really hate people like me. That's a really harsh statement. Good to know where I stand, though.
February 6, 201610 yr So you're not denying that liberals aren't trustworthy, you're just deflecting attention away instead instead of addressing the initial claim. So you believe all peoole who are liberals are untrustworthy and all people who are conservatives are trustworthy?
February 6, 201610 yr So you believe all peoole who are liberals are untrustworthy and all people who are conservatives are trustworthy? I honestly can't even fathom how you came to that conclusion. I guess people see what they want to.
February 6, 201610 yr Read what you posted. You didn't point to a specific liberal. You said liberals, which I took to mean you think all liberals collectively are untrustworthy. That implies you think all conservatively are trustworrhy. I asked the question to give you the opportunity to affirmitavely answer yes or no. But instead, you wonder how I could have taken words you plainly posted in any way other than with the intent that you did NOT post. So, again, do you think all people who identify as liberals are untrustworthy and that all who identify as conservatives are trustworthy? I think it's important to stop conversing with hyperbole and exaggeration. It does nothing to advance mutual understanding and real dialogue targeting solutions.
February 6, 201610 yr Read what you posted. You didn't point to a specific liberal. You said liberals, which I took to mean you think all liberals collectively are untrustworthy. That implies you think all conservatively are trustworrhy. I asked the question to give you the opportunity to affirmitavely answer yes or no. But instead, you wonder how I could have taken words you plainly posted in any way other than with the intent that you did NOT post. So, again, do you think all people who identify as liberals are untrustworthy and that all who identify as conservatives are trustworthy? I think it's important to stop conversing with hyperbole and exaggeration. It does nothing to advance mutual understanding and real dialogue targeting solutions. Ma'am, if you read closely, you will see that I wasn't attempting to answer the question using hyperbole. I never said that liberals were untrustworthy, nor did I say that conservatives were trust worthy. I simply pointed out that instead of the poster trying to disprove the claim that liberals were untrustworthy, the poster instead decided to minimalize the opposite political party. I'm with you, I think that type of strategy is weak and does nothing to advance the conversation. The "yeah well I maybe be bad but so are you" type of strategy that you would see in a middle school.
February 6, 201610 yr Clinton Ominously Tells Iowan Supporters To Mark Front Doors With Campaign Logo Before Sundown - The Onion - America's Finest News Source I think you may be right. :scared: Love the Onion even though they spend a lot of energy carrying water for the dems. Doesn't impact how dangerous a Hillary administration would be though. She's Nixonian to nth degree.
February 6, 201610 yr Love the Onion even though they spend a lot of energy carrying water for the dems. Doesn't impact how dangerous a Hillary administration would be though. She's Nixonian to nth degree. Seriously could she be ANY worse than the last Republican we had in office? For that matter the last 4 Republicans: Nixon(obvious), Reagan ( trickle down could be the culprit of modern income inequality), Bush (mini- recession), George W ( well...I'm not sure I have enough characters). Recent history tells me that conservatives leading this country may be more dangerous than any liberal.
February 6, 201610 yr Yes, she could and will be WAY worse than any of the last 4 republican's and even the last few Democrats save for Jimmy Carter.
February 6, 201610 yr Wow. You really hate people like me. That's a really harsh statement. Good to know where I stand, though. Naw, your not the one I'm talking about, I'm refering to the established liberals like Clinton, Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Jarrett, Etc
February 7, 201610 yr Seriously could she be ANY worse than the last Republican we had in office? For that matter the last 4 Republicans: Nixon(obvious)' date=' Reagan ( trickle down could be the culprit of modern income inequality), Bush (mini- recession), George W ( well...I'm not sure I have enough characters). Recent history tells me that conservatives leading this country may be more dangerous than any liberal.[/quote'] Oh how quickly you forget that Billary voted to go into Iraq.
February 7, 201610 yr Oh how quickly you forget that Billary voted to go into Iraq. How quickly you also forget the hardcore flag-waving and sabre-rattling used by Cheney and Co. to shame everybody for voting for said actions in Iraq. It was "vote for this or you hate America."
February 7, 201610 yr How quickly you also forget the hardcore flag-waving and sabre-rattling used by Cheney and Co. to shame everybody for voting for said actions in Iraq. It was "vote for this or you hate America." Great leadership your candidate has she can be coerced into anything. At least she's consistent.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.