Same tired old song from the left when they've got no intelligent counterpoint to offer. Frankly, you guys bore me after hearing the same things for 50 years.

There needs to be a point made before there can be an intelligent counterpoint. As evidence, revisit posts 25-35. See anything resembling "intelligence" there? Me neither. This junior high humor simply gets in the way of those of us who want to have a serious discussion.

There needs to be a point made before there can be an intelligent counterpoint. As evidence, revisit posts 25-35. See anything resembling "intelligence" there? Me neither. This junior high humor simply gets in the way of those of us who want to have a serious discussion.

 

This is hilarious on several levels. However, I agree.

A lot of the towel-snapping by the GOP bully boys (evidenced by today's comments) is simply because Mrs. Clinton is not a male Republican. Probably don't need to dig deeper than that.

 

There it is. If you disagree with the hag you're a misogynist. I would say that it's more a case of having an open mind and being able to think for myself rather then just being a sycophant for a group of party elites that tell you who you should support.

There needs to be a point made before there can be an intelligent counterpoint. As evidence, revisit posts 25-35. See anything resembling "intelligence" there? Me neither. This junior high humor simply gets in the way of those of us who want to have a serious discussion.

 

When have you ever wanted to have a serious conversation? How many threads over the years have you hijacked and taken on wild tangents because you can't make a point? You would never stoop to silly name calling would you?

There it is. If you disagree with the hag you're a misogynist. I would say that it's more a case of having an open mind and being able to think for myself rather then just being a sycophant for a group of party elites that tell you who you should support.

Those are big words you're using. I'm going to have to look them up first before I proffer a response.

Those are big words you're using. I'm going to have to look them up first before I proffer a response.

High brow comment there. Typical. Call everyone out for lack of meaningful reply to have serious discussion, then you offer this. Par for your course.

High brow comment there. Typical. Call everyone out for lack of meaningful reply to have serious discussion, then you offer this. Par for your course.

Don't you have some more insane illustrations of Mrs. Clinton to post?

Don't you have some more insane illustrations of Mrs. Clinton to post?

 

Sure. You liked the first one?

Here's one of my faves:

 

Those are big words you're using. I'm going to have to look them up first before I proffer a response.

 

Don't bother. Just continue living your life of blissful ignorance while the party elite continue to tell you who to vote for and that they'll take care of you because they know best.

Don't bother. Just continue living your life of blissful ignorance while the party elite continue to tell you who to vote for and that they'll take care of you because they know best.

I just vote the way my old union tells me to vote. Less strain on the brain.

 

By the way, AT, the notion of "hijacking a thread" is a myth. Just because the conversation goes to a place you find uncomfortable, that does not mean that a thread has been taken for a "wild ride."

I just vote the way my old union tells me to vote. Less strain on the brain.

 

By the way, AT, the notion of "hijacking a thread" is a myth. Just because the conversation goes to a place you find uncomfortable, that does not mean that a thread has been taken for a "wild ride."

 

The first line I don't doubt for a second.

 

The second part is laughable.

According to accounts of former Secret Services officers who guarded the Clintons, I get the impression the words they would use are snobby, arrogant and self-centered. Who truly felt she was entitled to be treated as a queen.

Here's one of my faves:

 

 

She got fired in 1974 for unethical behavior.

She got fired in 1974 for unethical behavior.

 

It's a pattern.