Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Executive Orders: President Washington - President Obama

Featured Replies

We hear about all of the use of EOs from President Obama. That usually gets a response of just how much worse President Bush's use of EOs were. Obama has had 193 EOs thus far with two years to go. W had 291 in his eight years. Go back one more president and Clinton had 364 in his eight years. Reagan had 381 in his two terms and Carter had 320 in one term. Now, I realize President Obama could pass any of the others with two years to go, but all of these presidents are EO lightweights when compared to some of the presidents throughout our history.

 

The worst offender of executive orders is FDR. He had a staggering 3,522 EOs in 12.12 years in office. That's a whopping 290.59 average EO per year!

 

Woodrow Wilson had 1,803 in eight years, Calvin Coolidge had 1,203 in less than six years in office, Theodore Roosevelt had 1,081 in just under seven and a half years, Harry S. Truman had 907 in just under 8 years and Taft had 724 in only four years.

 

By contrast George Washington had 8 in 7.85 years. John Adams, James Madison and James Monroe only had 1 each. Madison and Monroe both served two terms.

 

Executive Orders: Washington - Obama

 

I'm sure many of you were already aware of this, but for those that weren't I thought I'd give the number of executive orders by president since Washington. Just thought it was interesting.

The level of importance to the american public in what changes are made to public policy are worthy of taking into consideration. Exec orders that are not difference makers are different than single handily saying " I'm opening our borders and allowing millions of illegal immigrants to avoid documentation and further drain our education and Health Care systems. "

  • Author
The level of importance to the american public in what changes are made to public policy are worthy of taking into consideration. Exec orders that are not difference makers are different than single handily saying " I'm opening our borders and allowing millions of illegal immigrants to avoid documentation and further drain our education and Health Care systems. "
I completely and fully agree. This thread wasn't about what the EOs were/are, just the number.
I completely and fully agree. This thread wasn't about what the EOs were/are, just the number.

Seems to be a connection between a high number of executive orders and world wars.

  • Author
Seems to be a connection between a high number of executive orders and world wars.
Very true. Probably for good reasons. EOs aren't always a bad thing.

So, out of curiosity, had President Obama indicated he will use EO on Immigration Policy?

^ There was a bipartisan bill that passed the Senate, and for over a year now Boehner refuses to allow it to come to a vote in the House.

So' date=' out of curiosity, had President Obama indicated he will use EO on Immigration Policy?[/quote']

He said that whatever action he takes will take time, but the very minute that they pass immigration reform he will sign it and that it will supersede any action he took.

So....no intention on his part to enact legislation not passed by the Senate and House?

He said that whatever action he takes will take time, but the very minute that they pass immigration reform he will sign it and that it will supersede any action he took.

 

An EO that would be 'superseded' by a law is not really an EO. Its a usurpation.

What the Dems have also been totally silent about is that there have been several bills that have passed the house that deal first and foremost with securing thee border. Harry Reid has not let them be voted on. Why not? Maybe those would have passed as well and then Obama would have something to sign.

Yesterday our great leader goes to China and executively decides that he will implement large CO2 emission cuts while allowing g China to make no changes . He will avoid action thru congress and will implement the rules thru the EpA . Everyone's electric bill will rise , coAl Jobs are destroyed. We lose jobs , China laughs .

  • Author
So....no intention on his part to enact legislation not passed by the Senate and House?
Starting to sound like he does have intention.

 

Yesterday our great leader goes to China and executively decides that he will implement large CO2 emission cuts while allowing g China to make no changes . He will avoid action thru congress and will implement the rules thru the EpA . Everyone's electric bill will rise , coAl Jobs are destroyed. We lose jobs , China laughs .

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.