Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Kobe Bryant is the downfall of the Lakers

Featured Replies

  • Author
How is 27 million over 4 years overpaying for Thomas? Looks even better when the cap goes up like we all know it will. Less than 7 mill a year for 20 point a game scorer is a steal.

 

 

Nick Young is 4 years 21.5 million. A little over 5 million a year for a 20 point scorer.

 

It'd be stupid for the Lakers to pay that kind of money for a point guard when they are overpaying Lin and Nash. Get rid of Lin and Nash for Thomas and it works for me but who wants either one of them?

  • Replies 92
  • Views 10.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Author
Look, you are not about to convince me, and I won't convince you. But the FACT is, LA is the most attractive market in the NBA for a Superstar, Agreed? Yet the Lakers could have afforded at least one Superstar, maybe two - Agreed? Yet no Superstar came - Fact?

 

My list was by no means a list of who the Lakers should have went after, but it would be shocking that LA could not get something better than what they got. They got Nick Young, a guy on his fourth team in three years, yep, that sounds like a steal! No, I take that back, it sounds like desparation!

 

He was on the Lakers last year and came back. If playing with Kobe is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad why would he come back when he can go somewhere else and play? He chose to come back. Why is a 20 PPG scorer like Nick Young not capable of disqualifying the whole "nobody wants to play with Kobe crap"? Ramon Sessions is a more credible source? You kidding me?

 

LA is an attractive destination when they are capable of compteting for a title. They simply aren't that good and as we have stated multiple times in this thread Kobe's contract has more to do with that than Kobe's personality. The article is not trying to make that point though.

Umm, Nick Young has never averaged 20 a game, he is a career 12 ppg game. Yes, he will get his 17 with the Lakers, but somebody has to score......

 

LOL, as I have said to you many times, LA is the most attractive city in the NBA, yet they could not lure a true superstar there. As for the roster being as bad as it is, well, same demoninator, Kobe - no one wanted to come there except 50 yo PG's who still want a check!

 

Look forward to 2018 and pray the Kobe hangs up his Nike's or moves on.....

  • Author
Umm, Nick Young has never averaged 20 a game, he is a career 12 ppg game. Yes, he will get his 17 with the Lakers, but somebody has to score......

 

LOL, as I have said to you many times, LA is the most attractive city in the NBA, yet they could not lure a true superstar there. As for the roster being as bad as it is, well, same demoninator, Kobe - no one wanted to come there except 50 yo PG's who still want a check!

 

Look forward to 2018 and pray the Kobe hangs up his Nike's or moves on.....

 

My bad, he averaged 17.9 points a game last season. Forgive me for rounding up to 20. It does sound sexier than 18 even though it's off by one layup a game. My bad.

As I said, he scored 18-20 for a HORRIBLE team. Somebody had to score, and I guess it was the guy on his 4th team in 3 years. Must of been a LOT of teams pounding down his door.....

As I said, he scored 18-20 for a HORRIBLE team. Somebody had to score, and I guess it was the guy on his 4th team in 3 years. Must of been a LOT of teams pounding down his door.....

 

But it's such an attractive place to play. Surely that alone will just get them good players. How are they bad?

  • Author

This is Kobe's team because the Laker management said so. Kobe has won 5 titles. 5 rings. Been in the Finals 7 times. He's done it his way for a majority of his career. He's been a Laker and likely always will be. The Laker management gave him 40+ million over this year and next year. Why should he change who he is for anyone when the Laker management is paying him money to not pass the torch?

 

If we really want to break it down....Lebron has 2 titles and has lost in the Finals 4 times. He had to form the Heatles to do so. Why should Kobe do it "Lebron's Way" when the "Kobe Way" has been more fruitful?

 

 

I'll hang up and wait for an answer.

There was the George Mikan way! There was the Bill Russell way! There was the Magic Johnson way! There was the Larry Bird way! There was the Jordan way! And just like those are all history, there WAS the Kobe way!

 

Kobe will NOT change who he is. And Kobe will go down as one of the greatest to ever play. But, those days of greatness are history as the Celtics greatness is history. Kobe should not change, and I like it that way. Because as long as Kobe is in LA, LA will be no better than first round fodder in the playoffs!

  • Author
There was the George Mikan way! There was the Bill Russell way! There was the Magic Johnson way! There was the Larry Bird way! There was the Jordan way! And just like those are all history, there WAS the Kobe way!

 

Kobe will NOT change who he is. And Kobe will go down as one of the greatest to ever play. But, those days of greatness are history as the Celtics greatness is history. Kobe should not change, and I like it that way. Because as long as Kobe is in LA, LA will be no better than first round fodder in the playoffs!

 

Yeah, we know. :lol2:

Clipper answer is pretty obvious isn't it?

 

Yep that's my point, Clippers have everything going for them from a location point that the Lakers do...but over the years players didn't go there because it was a poorly run organization. With Dr. Buss gone the Lakers aren't anymore attractive than the Clippers are...the difference was in the ownership and how they treated the players.

Well, it all starts at the top. If Kobe is the way the article portrays, even if the article is just half true, then the front office has let this attitude and air of superiority continue and it has helped in damaging the Laker brand. As someone stated earlier, Mitch, Buss or someone should have brought Kobe into the office, closed the door, and had it out with him, letting him know something has to change, and have been willing to let him go if it didn't. They can't complain too loudly when they had complete control, or should have, of the situation.

 

Kobe also has to realize he is 36 year old Kobe, not 28 year old Kobe, and he needs more help now and can't be relied on to be "the man", no matter how bad he want's that. It's just a fact of getting "athletically old". Because of this, he has to change some. But it sounds like he just isn't willing to do that and in doing so, in my opinion, shows no loyalty to the Lakers.

  • Author
Well, it all starts at the top. If Kobe is the way the article portrays, even if the article is just half true, then the front office has let this attitude and air of superiority continue and it has helped in damaging the Laker brand. As someone stated earlier, Mitch, Buss or someone should have brought Kobe into the office, closed the door, and had it out with him, letting him know something has to change, and have been willing to let him go if it didn't. They can't complain too loudly when they had complete control, or should have, of the situation.

 

Kobe also has to realize he is 36 year old Kobe, not 28 year old Kobe, and he needs more help now and can't be relied on to be "the man", no matter how bad he want's that. It's just a fact of getting "athletically old". Because of this, he has to change some. But it sounds like he just isn't willing to do that and in doing so, in my opinion, shows no loyalty to the Lakers.

 

Shows no loyalty to the Lakers? Front offices don't pay people 24 million dollars a season to change. They pay people 10 million dollars a year to change. What message is the front office sending to Kobe that says they want him to change when they are paying him 1/3 of the salary cap?

Shows no loyalty to the Lakers? Front offices don't pay people 24 million dollars a season to change. They pay people 10 million dollars a year to change. What message is the front office sending to Kobe that says they want him to change when they are paying him 1/3 of the salary cap?

 

Proves the first point I made. Front office doesn't have the guts to do what they need to do. Kobe is who he is, for good or bad, and until the front office does something about it or he changes, it's all on them.

Triangle All-Stars: Kobe Bryant, the Perfect Teammate «

 

This sums up how I feel about the free agency and teammates:

 

Kobe kept the Lakers from adding superstars this summer? LeBron’s from Cleveland, not L.A. But sure, he didn’t want to meet with L.A. the same way he didn’t want to meet with Dwight Howard’s Houston team, or Goran Dragic’s Suns team, or anyone else but the Cavs and Heat this summer. Elsewhere, L.A. had the cap space to offer the max to Carmelo, but Melo could get more money in New York, so that’s where he went. What other superstars were there? Should the Lakers have given Eric Bledsoe $70 million so they could win 43 games and finish 10th in the West?

 

Kobe chased off teammates? Would the Lakers have been better off keeping Bynum? Or building around Dwight Howard for $100 million over the next five years? Or keeping Pau to try to win 40 games this year? I’m genuinely curious about which lottery ticket the Lakers missed out on because of Kobe Bryant the past few years.

 

...as for the contract:

 

Absolutely … if you’re comparing him to all the underpaid superstars across the NBA. But it was worth it to the Lakers to pay Kobe to stay relevant while they rebuild. And he’s probably the biggest reason the Lakers signed a $3 billion TV deal a few years ago. $48.5 million seems like a fair compromise for everyone.

 

and this:

 

For the rest of us, we can look at it like this: If this final two-year era of Kobe is a tax after 15 years of winning, it’s absolutely worth it.

 

The Lakers are rebuilding and rewarding Kobe at the same time, and staying in the spotlight while it happens. It’s actually not a bad plan. It’s better than what’s happening with the Celtics. They cut ties with their stars and gutted their roster, for … what exactly? How many Celtics games are you watching this year?

 

But will you watch every Lakers game on national TV to see what happens with Kobe?

Triangle All-Stars: Kobe Bryant, the Perfect Teammate «

 

This sums up how I feel about the free agency and teammates:

 

Kobe kept the Lakers from adding superstars this summer? LeBron’s from Cleveland, not L.A. But sure, he didn’t want to meet with L.A. the same way he didn’t want to meet with Dwight Howard’s Houston team, or Goran Dragic’s Suns team, or anyone else but the Cavs and Heat this summer. Elsewhere, L.A. had the cap space to offer the max to Carmelo, but Melo could get more money in New York, so that’s where he went. What other superstars were there? Should the Lakers have given Eric Bledsoe $70 million so they could win 43 games and finish 10th in the West?

 

Kobe chased off teammates? Would the Lakers have been better off keeping Bynum? Or building around Dwight Howard for $100 million over the next five years? Or keeping Pau to try to win 40 games this year? I’m genuinely curious about which lottery ticket the Lakers missed out on because of Kobe Bryant the past few years.

 

...as for the contract:

 

Absolutely … if you’re comparing him to all the underpaid superstars across the NBA. But it was worth it to the Lakers to pay Kobe to stay relevant while they rebuild. And he’s probably the biggest reason the Lakers signed a $3 billion TV deal a few years ago. $48.5 million seems like a fair compromise for everyone.

 

and this:

 

For the rest of us, we can look at it like this: If this final two-year era of Kobe is a tax after 15 years of winning, it’s absolutely worth it.

 

The Lakers are rebuilding and rewarding Kobe at the same time, and staying in the spotlight while it happens. It’s actually not a bad plan. It’s better than what’s happening with the Celtics. They cut ties with their stars and gutted their roster, for … what exactly? How many Celtics games are you watching this year?

 

But will you watch every Lakers game on national TV to see what happens with Kobe?

So, this boils down to the fact that PP92 is part of the Triangle All Stars.:lol2:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.