Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Targeting: Do You Agree With The Ejection?

Do you agree with the ejections as a result of targeting penalties? 6 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you agree with the ejections as a result of targeting penalties?

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

Watching the Carolina/Tennessee game, and yet another player has been ejected due to targeting. IMO, it was clear he wasn't trying to hurt the guy, it was just poor form. There was helmet to helmet contact, so the ruling was upheld and the player was ejected.

 

By definition, the hit was targeting. Fine, whatever. The rules being put on defensive players have gone far beyond my taste a long time ago, but that is a battle us "old fashioned" football guys aren't going to win. My biggest problem now has become the ejections. Do we REALLY think it's necessary to eject these players after ONE hit? I just can't justify it. If you call targeting on a player once, penalize them with the 15 yards, no ejection. If they do it again, then you can eject them. This is a "shoot first, ask questions later" approach, IMO. It's not fair to the defensive players.

 

Do you agree or disagree with the ejections?

  • Replies 33
  • Views 4.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I watched that play and just seen it again in the Fla./ Mizzu game. Terrible that kids are being ejected over playing hard.

 

Football is a violent sport and yes injuries occur. Yes they should try to prevent all they can. But this rule is killing the game.

It's ridiculous. Stupidest rule I've ever seen in sports. Guys aren't allowed to tackle any more.

Its like asking Boxers not to throw a jab. That is how stupid the rule is.

Call the penalty, fine, you'll get no argument from me. Heck, make it the equivalent of a yellow card in soccer. You get one, it's a penalty, you get another in the game it's an ejection. I'm fine with that even. I'm flipping back and forth between USC/Tennessee and Mizzo/UF and it happens on the first possession in each game. Just ridiculous.

It's ridiculous. Stupidest rule I've ever seen in sports. Guys aren't allowed to tackle any more.

 

Agreed

By rule it was a justified ejection.

 

I'm not a fan of this at all though. We will get to the point that guys start shooting low and taking out the legs because they are worried about the targeting rule. This is going to lead to a lot more knee injuries. I think that is exactly what happened a couple weeks ago in the UGA v Tenn game. RB caught it out of the backfield and the defender was in great position to make a tackle but he dove at the guys legs and hurt the UGA player's knee.

SEC has had 3 ejections thus far today.

  • Author

The ejection from the UGA/Vandy game is the worst call I've ever seen in my life.

The ejection from the UGA/Vandy game is the worst call I've ever seen in my life.

 

That one may be the one that gets the rule changed.

The ejection from the UGA/Vandy game is the worst call I've ever seen in my life.

 

I agree. Couldn't believe it. They are ruining football. Tim Brando is an idiot.

Call the penalty, fine, you'll get no argument from me. Heck, make it the equivalent of a yellow card in soccer. You get one, it's a penalty, you get another in the game it's an ejection. I'm fine with that even. I'm flipping back and forth between USC/Tennessee and Mizzo/UF and it happens on the first possession in each game. Just ridiculous.

 

This is the way I see it as well. One, you're warned, two, you're gone.

 

Ohio State just lost their All-American corner Roby to this.

  • Author

Ohio State guy definitely launched into the receiver.

 

Still don't like the ejection.

Ohio State guy definitely launched into the receiver.

 

Still don't like the ejection.

 

He led with shoulder and forearm and gave up at least 50 + pounds to the guy. Clearly the contact is initiated under this Hawkeyes players armpit and chest level. One, this "launch" concept must be better defined. So if you keep your feet and attempt to run thru the player it isn't a launch?

 

Two, do we tell players to stop and waive a flag informing the ball carrier we're about to tackle you. Here's a thought, throw the flag on the QB who leads their receiver into imminent threat because he misread the defense. See how silly this is becoming?

 

So if he runs through the player at the knees it's not a launch. But resulting damage is OK at the knee.

 

It's football in retrospect and with it comes risks. I envision my grandsons and I watching the 2025 Super Bowl being won by a flag being pulled off someones hip before they cross the end zone.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.