If you acknowledge that someone was better and can identify where they were better, then you can get better. Too many people fail to realize their weaknesses and consequently fail to improve those areas. If you think that it was purely physical, the spin doc might be able to go into his lab and create flubber or something to enhance physical abilities. You know that he in the founder of Balcor.

You also are correct, I too took some "enhancements" of my own concoction, however, I forgot to work out! :jump:

Why wouldn't you want to be the base? I think that there are certain angles that couldn't be improved upon. I knew a guy that was a base and was a better hitter that Rose Hill's cheerleading guru. As for you potions, I'm sure they were toxic.

Why wouldn't you want to be the base? I think that there are certain angles that couldn't be improved upon. I knew a guy that was a base and was a better hitter that Rose Hill's cheerleading guru. As for you potions, I'm sure they were toxic.

Yes, but could he run? I wonder where he is today? :confused:

Guys let's try to stay on topic. You are tarnishing the Cubster's poll.

Oops, the poll, misspelled one word, other than that, seems logical. I think Russell is playing better and a loss to a rival is less than a shock. Just ask West or Boyd. I know East beat Ashland, but I watched a 7 yr old team that scores more than 40 points per game. (Apples and oranges I know) Fact is you can get ready to throw the polls out the window and decide it on the floor. Right now all we have are questions and soon we will have the answers. Good luck to all. It should be an interesting ride.

Poll looks good as usual Cubster.

Seems to be a very accurate poll. Arguments can be made to move a team a place or two any time. Any team in this region is capable of beating any other. That is what makes these polls so fun to talk about.

Seems to be a very accurate poll. Arguments can be made to move a team a place or two any time. Any team in this region is capable of beating any other. That is what makes these polls so fun to talk about.

 

Now I wouldn't say any team could beat any!

Elliott #3? They need to be 4th or 5th IMO. Because they beat morgan cause that was one of there best games this year, and they shot a great %. Also boyd should be #2 cause they beat elliott earlier in the year.

 

Elliott hit 25 of 52 shot's at Morgan (48%) and that is very good, but it is not their best shooting game of the year by quite some margin!!!!! :banana:

48% is pretty good against Morgan I'd say. Most people don't shoot that well.

48% is pretty good against Morgan I'd say. Most people don't shoot that well.

 

Morgan also made 8 of 15 3's, I would venture to say that "Most people don't shoot that well".

 

:fire:

Morgan shot 8 of 16 three's for 50%...but 29% inside 15' for the game.

 

Stellar.

Morgan shot 8 of 16 three's for 50%...but 29% inside 15' for the game.

 

:sssh:

Morgan shot 8 of 16 three's for 50%...but 29% inside 15' for the game.

 

Stellar.

 

:laugh:

 

Maybe they should shot more three's?

 

:fire:

1. Morgan-Couple easy wins after loss to Elliott

2. Elliott-Big test at Ashland Tuesday

3. Boyd-Two good home wins for the Lions

4. Fairview-Some losses to good comp

5. Greenup-Big jump for the Musketeers

6. Russell-Devils have all week to get ready for Boyd

7. Raceland-Ramblers play tough every night

8. Rowan-Vikings have good shooters

9. Ashland-Tomcats take a dip after tough week

10.West-Jones doing it all

11.East- Big win and big loss in same week

12.Fleming-Competitive bunch

13.Rose Hill-Need a signature win

14.Menifee-Team is dangerous

15.Lewis- Still need a region win

16.Bath-Some winds late could mean an escape from cellar

 

Another crazy week in 16th. Some big draws occur in 61st and 63rd this week.

 

 

Ouch, the ole Cubster just cant find anybody to put in front of Boyd at the second spot that is better or going to hold on to the spot..... :thumb: Keep trying Cub, somebody will win 2 in a row for ya....Try Ashland, they have a weaker schedule coming up :thumb: :thumb: