Are Scott folks happy with Coach Carr? I've heard from people that his handling/dealing with kids lacks something to be desired. I couldnt pick him out of a crowd and know nothing about him other than that.

Obviously he is still dealing with attitudes and different type issues. It's only his second (maybe third) year of running his own program. Give the guy a chance. He'll learn from his mistakes just like his players do. Sounds to me like he is trying to make them better people before he worries about making them better players. Sadly, this is the part most people dont see as TROUBLE SHOOTER put it in a previous post.

As long as Howard isn't inelgible, Scott will beat CC if they play like they did against boone. You can keep anyone out of Scotts lineup but as long it isnt, Howard he gives the eagles the best chance to win.

Then Howard better learn how to bring the ball up the floor.

Then Howard better learn how to bring the ball up the floor.

 

 

:ylsuper:

You would need to ask Carr that question.

 

What exactly did you mean then? :confused:

:laugh:

You trying to say that if Howard wasn't in the game, Scott would be a better team. Because last time i checked Howard is a top 5 player in nky, so i don't see how you can laugh about that. He is the only thing stable with the eagles.

Obviously he is still dealing with attitudes and different type issues. It's only his second (maybe third) year of running his own program. Give the guy a chance. He'll learn from his mistakes just like his players do. Sounds to me like he is trying to make them better people before he worries about making them better players. Sadly, this is the part most people dont see as TROUBLE SHOOTER put it in a previous post.

 

 

Agreed no one was dogging on Carr when the eagles where 12-3. They go on a strecth against better teams and its Carr's fault. One thing i hate about sports is when the coach gets none of the credit and all of the blame. If the kids would do what they were supposed to then he wouldn't have any inelgible players.

Only one is ineligible, the other one is not.

 

Which one is inelgible.

What exactly did you mean then? :confused:

 

I meant he is the coach and could answer the question on who will play tonight.

Which one is inelgible.

 

Give it a rest. :sssh:

I meant he is the coach and could answer the question on who will play tonight.

 

 

Then why did you post this?

 

"Only one is ineligible, the other one is not."

Then why did you post this?

 

"Only one is ineligible, the other one is not."

 

I agree, maybe you have no information.

I agree, maybe you have no information.

 

:laugh: ...agreed. There is no way Carr would sit a starter unless he was sick or did something to effect the team (grades, actions towards team..etc.)

Why do threads start out as predictions, and then end up with someone either getting bashed, taunted, baited, or just plain hammered. Scott over Camels by 4...in overtime.

:laugh: ...agreed. There is no way Carr would sit a starter unless he was sick or did something to effect the team (grades, actions towards team..etc.)

They are inelgible from thrusdays game. I believe it is a 100% that they won't be playing. It is 2 of the starters to. I know that for sure. Won't say names, you will see thrusday.----bigstick23

 

 

Didn't you kind of start this whole mess with the above post??

 

I still predict a close game, that probably too close to call!!

Agreed no one was dogging on Carr when the eagles where 12-3. They go on a strecth against better teams and its Carr's fault. One thing i hate about sports is when the coach gets none of the credit and all of the blame. If the kids would do what they were supposed to then he wouldn't have any inelgible players.

 

 

Too many questions about eligibility and who is not playing. Focus should be about the kids who have taken care of their business in the classroom. Time for someone from the Eagles bench to step up.....Castleman, Felts or Smith will need some productive minutes for Scott to win.