Doesn't matter. westsider has that post on speed dial.

 

It's okay. I take everything WS says with a shot of penicillin.

Doesn't matter. westsider has that post on speed dial.

As long as people use biased, discredited websites, what's wrong with pointing that out?

It's okay. I take everything WS says with a shot of penicillin.

At least you're getting my take. I'm not parroting some ridiculously biased website.

It won't.

 

Especially during the silly season. The next 5+ months should be amusing.

As long as people use biased, discredited websites, what's wrong with pointing that out?

Because you only do it if it is a right leaning site. Plus you never add anything to back up your position nor do you actually make an attempt to discredit the info given. Attacking the source doesn't make the information wrong.

Especially during the silly season. The next 5+ months should be amusing.

 

True, and exhausting.

Because you only do it if it is a right leaning site. Plus you never add anything to back up your position nor do you actually make an attempt to discredit the info given. Attacking the source doesn't make the information wrong.

 

All of us left leaners could always go to left leaning websites for our own sources of info that contradicts your sources but then our sources would be the ones wrong and not credible. Correct? Of course everything that contradicts a right leaning thought is from the biased liberal media anyways. Correct? That's what I thought.

Because you only do it if it is a right leaning site. Plus you never add anything to back up your position nor do you actually make an attempt to discredit the info given. Attacking the source doesn't make the information wrong.

I've read that site ... I'm smart enough to know it lacks even a shred of credibility. Yet I would rather let people, if they're interested in knowing, read it themselves and make their own judgment.

 

There are actually few sites I've said that about on here ... unfortunately, it seems, the same ones (NewsMax and NewsBusters, most frequently) get cited here a lot. Neither of them has established much in the way of credibility.

 

Heck, how many "left-wing" sites get linked here? Very few. I don't even read them.

Any pursuit of impeachment on this is just another nail in the coffin of Congress. Can Congress' approval rating go any lower? That line from Dumb and Dumber comes to mind.

I've read that site ... I'm smart enough to know it lacks even a shred of credibility. Yet I would rather let people, if they're interested in knowing, read it themselves and make their own judgment.

 

There are actually few sites I've said that about on here ... unfortunately, it seems, the same ones (NewsMax and NewsBusters, most frequently) get cited here a lot. Neither of them has established much in the way of credibility.

 

Heck, how many "left-wing" sites get linked here? Very few. I don't even read them.

But instead of just making a blanket statement of the source isn't credible, discredit the info. TMZ was a joke until they started actually breaking stories. Now their still some what of a joke but most are not too quick to just write them off when they report something.

^

 

I've never known TMZ to not be credible when breaking stories or just in general. They are far from the Enquirer.

But instead of just making a blanket statement of the source isn't credible, discredit the info. TMZ was a joke until they started actually breaking stories. Now their still some what of a joke but most are not too quick to just write them off when they report something.

The biggest discredit to the report is the source.

 

If this story gets reported on a reputable site, I'll pay attention.