No scars in the middle of your chest, though - are there???

 

Frances

 

Nope.

Maybe the wolves got my illegitimate grandson. You may have been abandoned by someone else...

 

Frances

I'll take Ashland in this one! 64- 59. Thomas and McDavid take care of business against the eagles

1. Morgan-a lukewarm but deserving #1

2. Fairview-This TEAM is playing well

3. Boyd-Rough trip for the Lions

4. Blazer-Wilcox has made a difference

5. Elliott-Run and gun Lions are fun to watch

6. Russell-Still one of teams who can make it to Rupp

7. West-Nice AIT showing

8. Greenup-Still need a quality win

9. East-scrappy team who will compete

10.Raceland-always a tough out come March

11.Rowan-Daniel needs some scoring help

12.Rose Hill-Nice win over Lawrence

13.Fleming-still a 16th mystery

14.Menifee-new coach seems to be doing well

15.Lewis-still a work in progress

16.Bath-Cats still looking up

 

Now we can really see the cream rise to the top as inter-region play begins with some great matchups this week.

TBF please dissect and tear down this poll.

 

 

Cantrall's rating from today's paper:

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/sports/high_school/13532567.htm

16TH REGION

1. Morgan Co. 69.0

2. Fairview 67.4

3. Elliott Co. 66.9

4. Ashland Blazer 65.9

5. Rowan Co. 62.3

6. Boyd Co. 61.7

7. Greenup Co. 61.0

8. Russell 59.8

9. West Carter 59.4

10. East Carter 56.0

11. Raceland 54.4

12. Menifee Co. 52.8

13. Fleming Co. 51.8

14. Bath Co. 47.9

15. Rose Hill Christian 47.8

16. Lewis Co. 40.1

 

Granted it lacks the personal touch and only comes from a bunch of statistics on a computer, but there it is!

I'll take Ashland in this one! 64- 59. Thomas and McDavid take care of business against the eagles

I dont recall this being the Ashland vs Fairview predictions thread.

Cantrall's rating from today's paper:

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/sports/high_school/13532567.htm

16TH REGION

1. Morgan Co. 69.0

2. Fairview 67.4

3. Elliott Co. 66.9

4. Ashland Blazer 65.9

5. Rowan Co. 62.3

6. Boyd Co. 61.7

7. Greenup Co. 61.0

8. Russell 59.8

9. West Carter 59.4

10. East Carter 56.0

11. Raceland 54.4

12. Menifee Co. 52.8

13. Fleming Co. 51.8

14. Bath Co. 47.9

15. Rose Hill Christian 47.8

16. Lewis Co. 40.1

 

Granted it lacks the personal touch and only comes from a bunch of statistics on a computer, but there it is!

Amazing that Boyd is ranked below Elliott and Ashland, both of which were beaten by the Lions.

Amazing that Boyd is ranked below Elliott and Ashland, both of which were beaten by the Lions.

 

That is odd. I wonder how long the Cantrall ratings take before they start incorporating scores from this year.

 

Obviously, they don't seem to have the problem of rating schools that no longer exist...

 

Frances

Oh well, what does a computer know about 16th region basketball anyway???

I think the Cantrall ratings are way off base or off center or anyway off. What do you make of all of this discussion and opinions, Mocephus?

That is odd. I wonder how long the Cantrall ratings take before they start incorporating scores from this year.

 

Obviously, they don't seem to have the problem of rating schools that no longer exist...Frances

I think you mean the Courier-Journal's Litratings.

Amazing that Boyd is ranked below Elliott and Ashland, both of which were beaten by the Lions.

 

I believe that strength of schedule is a factor in these rankings. That will help explain Ashlands ranking.

Apparently it does instead of wins and losses. Good thing strength of schedule doesn't count in the win/loss column :thumb:

I think you mean the Courier-Journal's Litratings.

 

Actually, I was making the comment that "at least the Cantrall ratings don't have the same problem as the Litkenhous ratings". Notice that I say that "they don't seem to have the problem of rating schools that no longer exist..."

 

The "don't" indicating that Cantrall does NOT have the same problem as the Litkenhous ratings.

 

Sorry if that was unclear.

 

Frances

Actually, I was making the comment that "at least the Cantrall ratings don't have the same problem as the Litkenhous ratings". Notice that I say that "they don't seem to have the problem of rating schools that no longer exist..."

 

The "don't" indicating that Cantrall does NOT have the same problem as the Litkenhous ratings.

 

Sorry if that was unclear.

 

Frances

:confused: Sorry, my bad! :confused:

:confused: Sorry, my bad! :confused:

 

LOL - not to worry, addout. I wish I could say that I've never misread a post, but that would be a lie - and a bad one...

 

Frances