inmyopinion

Whitley--44 Pulaski--35 Final

1:44 left...... Whitley scores and goes for two.... Whitley--44 Pulaski--35

11 minutes in the 4th..... Whitley fumbles, Pulaski recovers.....wait officials give it back to Whitley. Terrible Call!! Whitley scores on next play. Whitley--36 Pulaski--35

37 seconds in the 3rd...... Pulaski 35 Whitley 28

Whitley

7:30 in the 3rd.... Whitley fumbles, Pulaski recovers and kicks a 30+ yard field goal Pulaski 29 Whitley28

9:42 left in the 3rd... Whitley--28 Pulaski--26

Good game tonight as both teams had their ups and downs. Good luck next week to PC and Southwestern!

Too bad both schools will be missing anyone for this one. Should be a great game anyway. Average Joe---I wasn't implying that Hines was blameless, just saying from what I saw I do not see how the official which threw the flag could have heard anything as he was too far away. When the flag came out, I believe the assumption from everyone was a block in the back.

What warrents an unsportsmanlike flag for a player who was obviously hit hard from behind. I know he didn't throw any punches.:fight:

If both were ejected, how does one get to play and not the other? I'm not sure what happened at Pulaski....Winston was hit from behind and then the flag was thrown on him. We thought the call was on the other team. Why was the kid from Southwestern ejected?

It was reported in the paper today that Rockcastle Co. would have actually went to the state if the parent from Corbin had not butted in. IMO it should be up to the players to call out misplays on the course, not some parent. I've seen plenty of matches where players did not follow protocol but I would never have put my 2 cents worth in. If the players the kid was playing with didn't know the rules enough to question the play......well enough said.

Final

Bylaw 5 section 2--the percentage is 25% of the districts graduation requirements. So if the district requires 24 and you earn 6 credits during the year you are repeating...you are eligible..even if you are not back with your graduating class.

There is a one time re-instatement clause that allows you to be eligible in the year following your ineligible year if you earn a certain % of the credits needed for graduation(even if it only makes you a sophomore when you should be a junior) during the year you are sitting out....you must continue to earn the required % each year to remain eligible...it is in the handbook. Obviously you can never get back the year you were repeating.