02Ram54

Uh, is this in print? Or should we take your word for it?

Next to St. Xavier in the rankings, what does it say the record is? I really hope X fans aren't going to be like this all year. If X wins out and wins state, are we going to have to listen to them all season about how they were 'undefeated?'

Now you're setting a standard that can't be measured. The best way to answer the question asked would be the way Hatz did so, by looking at church goer's divorce rates.

Eastern, Meade Co, and Warren Central. I'm pretty sure the Trinity loss is the only one that counts against Manual, the Lit doesn't take into account out of state competition. So that's not a bad loss, and statistically there were some good things even in that game.

4 teams from R2D4 in the overall top 15! 1. St. Xavier (4-1) 131.9 2. Trinity (4-1) 131.5 3. Male (4-0) 130.5 4. Highlands (3-3) 124.3 5. Covington Catholic (4-1) 123.0 6. Bowling Green (5-1) 117.4 7. Mercer County (5-0) 116.5 8. Central (4-1) 114.8 9. Ryle (4-1) 112.3 10. Henry Clay (5-0) 111.7 11. Christian County (3-2) 109.2 12. Pleasure Ridge Park (5-0) 108.9 13. Johnson Central (6-0) 107.3 14. Western (5-0) 106.7 15. Manual (3-2) 106.2 16. Lexington Catholic (3-1) 106.0 17. Owensboro (4-1) 105.7 18. Henderson County (4-1) 105.4 19. Scott County (3-2) 104.6 20. Franklin County (4-1) 104.4

And those changes have crippled it, haven't they? Oh wait, it's considered a success. And like I said before, what do congressional democrats have to do with Bill Clinton?

It's not like they gave the NYT the actual document. They discussed with the Times the conclusions of one part of the document.

You don't understand. Manual is a young team and many of their would be JV players are starters or key backups on Fridays. Manual doesn't have the depth to play around with that.

The difference is, the partial leak was made by several people with varrying agendas and political persuasions, and they all agreed on what the report said. Now you can accuse the NYT of fibbing about their sources, but I personally would bet against it. For one, there would be counter sources if that were true, or sources going to other papers and claiming they were misquouted. Then you have Bush with a clear political agenda, with the luxury being a single source that gets to cherry pick the information he gives out. I'll trust the partial leaked report over the partial released information

Sure he will...

No he won't.

Here's an NPR article on the welfare reform Clinton teamed with Republicans to pass.

X starts district play this week against another rival, and I think both coaches are more concerned about their district schedule.

Did Clinton veto it or sign it? This isn't a discussion on Congressional Democrats, we're talking about Clinton.

Wow, might have been clever except Bill Clinton signed welfare benefit cuts, reductions, and time limits...:thumb:

Do many of the young Varsity contributors for Manual play JV?

:thumb: :thumb: :thumb:

Like Clinton said, at least he tried... In all honesty, I don't think either Clinton or Bush is at fault for 9/11. Islamic Jihad is at fault for 9/11. But the way the right wingers have tried to pin it on Bill, he deserves the right to point that out.

Look, I know you're trying to pump them up and everything, but yeesh.

I only hope X shares your attitude.

Here's the CJ article on Anderson: http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060925/SPORTS05/60925032

At the end of their terms Clinton the First and Reagan went out statistically even (68% approval) but that isn't even a valid point. By 1993, Reagan was incapable of serious campaigning, and more was known nationally about his illness. Clinton, on the other hand, would still be physically able to defeat Bush and run the country if he were legally permitted.

Not to mention placing two justices on the court, replacing the swing voter. Republicans use this issue to capture the evangelical vote and spur them to the polls; its too good of an issue for them to do such a silly thing as RESOLVE IT.

:thumb:

It's not my argument. It's the argument of James.