bellalumni40

Stevenson really looked awful with the ball in his hands. UTC got up in everybody and when he had the ball I dont know if he got away a clean pass all night.

That would be the idea with two points off a Meeks jumper in the second half.

Lots of positives with one glaring negative to me. 2 bench points.

If he is a first rounder, you go. Plain and simple. Your stock can always fall. Look at Leinart, it cost him some dollars.

Most of the people I know have ended up with tickets on the Clemson side.

If you are gonna take that chance, go with TO.

Are we in a keeper? Have you ever played a keeper? Thats right. I dont want to hear it. Keepers are based only slightly on potential, and in this case I cant see taking two guys that may or may not perform next year. Reggie b/c of how many snaps Deuce gets, Colston, b/c he is not yet proven as he's a WR so you can never really tell.

No way you keep two guys from the same team unless it was something like Peyton and Marvin or now LT and Gates. Colston is not on that level.

If Ramon Harris comes in ready to play its possible he takes the backup SF minutes and we are more able to run Perry at the 4 to start the game and back him up with Stevenson. Right now Perry is still going to have to run some of the 3 spot.

I take it you looked past the fact that Tubby elected to go with the more up tempo style. Getting shots up quicker gives less time to turn it over. We'll see if that is the case, but that is what he said in the article.

Who is Rameel? I could have sworn it was Ramel....

I'm gonna disagree on SA. Like you said, he's on the back end. I think if it were me I would go with Bush and either Brown or possibly even TO. He looks pretty good with Romo.

While not all are great moral characters, they are businessmen and know the difference between a good move and a bad move in the eyes of the public. Also, David Stern does seem to have some sense, and I think he could influence the situation if the issue did come up.

I believe that you dont desire for RM to leave early. I get your stance for staying four years. However, I dont believe your feelings would be hurt either and that you would enjoy the days that follow on the message board and otherwise.

Those names were for GT since he was, with reason, all over my Paul Shirely comment. Other players being more worthy is irrelevant? I dont think so. If guys are available and more worthy, then Randolph is a non issue and I believe teams look at those guys before they do Randolph b/c they are looking for work, and RM is not necessarily looking for work.

You dont have to play well to get in the playoffs?

Would you feel any better if Tressel voted for Florida?

My apologies for being in school and not having my job being following sports. Get with me next year.

If you say so....

I can find several guys that are sitting on NBA benches, inactive lists, and D-League teams, without mentioning the out of work Keith Van Horn, Vin Baker, and Brian Grant. A few guys with minimal statistics or none at all listed as on NBA team that could be traded for or would potentially become available later in the season are: Your boy Max. Brandon Bass Mark Madsen Maurice Taylor Nikoloz Tskitishvilli Sean Marks Brian Scalabrine Danny Fortson Othella Harrington Pat Burke Pat Garrity Malik Rose Bo Outlaw Darius Songaila Melvin Ely All of these guys are experienced and for one reason or another are not playing or are on inactive lists. I'm having a tough time finding the guys who are with no teams at this point. They are likely playing small ball and dont keep a list. I think most teams would make an effort to get most of these guys over RM.

My point is made.

Would I have asked about it if I knew? Was I arguing they should have a conference championship? In this case, I actually do ask knowing the answers...

Get one more. It's dumb to be called the Big Ten with eleven teams....

Should I have bolded conference?

Extra game against a quality opponent cant hurt if you win either. Why no conference championship game?