gametime

Yup. He'll leave eventually, but he isn't looking to jump at any opportunity that presents itself. As long as UC takes care of him and supports the program he'll be around until something opens up that he can't refuse...

Congrats Snottie. **

UNC and Michigan St didn't manage to dominate UCLA like UC did in this one. Discredit how Cincinnati played to your hearts content. Maybe this team is a little better than everyone thought...

So, you want to pay him 23 million to make the team worse. Hard pass...

UCF claimed a title because one of the recognized computer models had them #1 after the end if the season. That won't happen this year, so even if undefeated they will have no claim of a national title...

That's a no for me dawg...

It varies depending on the wording in each contract...

Fake news...

It’s a cluttered mess because most college kids are still very average from where the line is now. Moving it back is only going to make that worse...

We're pretty much at the point where contested shots at the rim are worse than clean looks from three as well. I do think there's a conversation to be had about going to the international three point line. The NBA line is just too far back for most all college kids...

No. If the % of makes had taken a sizable jump, maybe but as it stands the difference is the number taken. By in large the college kids don't have the strength or developed skill to hit from NBA range with any level of consistency...

Sure, and it isn't cheap. UC doesn't agree to the deal if there isn't a game at Nippert included. If OSU wants to pay a heavy price to get out of it, that's the cost of doing good business...

Except the only reason UC agreed to the deal is one game was contracted to be at Nippert and OSU bought it out. They wouldn't have agreed to the deal otherwise because it's a terrible deal. The buyout money did fund a large portion of the practice facility and bubble, so that was nice. Good effort though...

Mullen said it himself. A 2 for 1 with a game at UCF is standard for an SEC vs AAC type series. A 2 road, 1 neutral is a slap in the face...

I’ve talked to three different people with knowledge of the situation and they all say the actual deal was 2 at the Swamp and 1 in the Citrus Bowl. UCF came back with 1 at Swamp, 1 at UCF and 1 neutral and UF said no. I’d agree if UCF turned down an actual 2 for 1, they look really bad claiming no one will play them. That’s a fair deal given the current landscape...

They don’t mention it because it would change the narrative. Florida has no interest in making a fair offer, so they do something they know there is zero chance UCF would agree to and boom here we are. The P5 heavy national and regional media spin it to make UCF look bad for not making a terrible business decision, and the general public laps it up as if UCF won’t schedule Florida. Rinse and repeat...

Camping World Stadium. Home of the Citrus Bowl...

So UCF should bend over and take it. Kick rocks...

The deal does not include playing at UCFs stadium. UC playing at Paul Brown Stadium is not a home game for UC. They play at Nippert Stadium. This isn’t hard...

Compromise is 2 games in the Swamp and one at UCF. Signing a 3 game deal without a home game isn’t compromise, it’s ignorance. Plain and simple...

A 2 for 1 with 2 in Gainesville and none on UCFs home field. I’d tell them to stick it where the sun don’t shine...

Wes just had a way of making everything MUCH easier. Still going to land a couple top 10 kids a year without his influence, but not having that insider juice with the true stars is a problem when battling with K and his bench full of former Dukie names. It is what it is. You are simply going to struggle to produce at the level they did if you don't have the biggest influence in the game at your side any more...

2010. He had his prints on things for a few years after, but by 2013 or 14 he was out of the loop...

Word. You want to be a predator, good luck in prison kid...

Cal never had the juice. Wes did. I keep trying to tell you this...