formerkywrestler

People like Nick Cannon? I'm serious...I can't tell if these posts are fake or not.

I would agree with this. If the coaching is violating the rules, they are being reported, and nothing is being done then the greater issue is with the league.

Then report it and report the illegal pitch counts. Seems simple enough.

If there is a pitch count rule I'd be shocked if it weren't kept up with somewhere. If it's not, why have the rule?

So you don't know they're cheating.

If I had concrete proof I would report it. Hell, I'd let the other coach know I reported it.

Found in his system as in "he smoked sometime in the last 30ish days"?

I accidentally watched it yesterday evening. I don't care to again. That video is tough.

If the coach is actually cheating aka "breaking the rules" then they should be reported. End of story. If not, then it sounds like they are doing things you don't approve of but they aren't cheating. Whether it's ethical or good for the kid is another discussion.

Then why hasn't it been reported?

I haven't saw one way or the other regarding if he's keeping his job.

That would be kind of awesome.

Nice update. Sheriff cuts sentences of Georgia inmates after they saved correctional officer’s life | Fox 59

Whoa...

I'm not sure. I don't know the specifics on the testimony. All I've said is from his position he would have a decent view, he doesn't ever go for his firearm, and it appears pretty plainly to me that he retreats once the officer starts firing in that general direction. I don't care to get into whether he is guilty or innocent in a criminal trial which is why I haven't read much on the testimonies.

The hypothetical in this situation doesn't give us much. I'm sure if Mr. Castile was alive he would back up what he said in the audio where he calmly tells the officer he has a gun then calmly tells the officer he isn't reaching. In this hypothetical the officer is in jail for murder. So, that's why I'm not answering your hypothetical. It's not relevant to my statement.

You're ignoring that we can't see inside the vehicle.

Actually, that's EXACTLY what you are doing. I've said over and over again I can see what direction the second officer is looking into. If I need to keep explaining how I can see that then you are living on a different planet. I've also stated repeatedly that none of us can see what's going on inside the vehicle. We have the video we can see, the audio, and four extremely biased eyewitnesses. Somehow from that you have inferred you know exactly what is going on in the vehicle. You know that Mr. Castile was reaching for his firearm. You know that Mr. Castile was disobeying what the officer says. You even know what the 2nd officer can't see. How you know all of this is beyond me. I've simply said he shouldn't be on the streets. And I inferred that if I were black I'd be doubly scared of that officer pulling me over. That's because I a) don't know what caused the officer to panic and kill Mr. Castile and b) if I were black I'd be even more scared of prejudices causing a situation to escalate into a tragic end as this one did. I didn't state that's why this officer did it. But something -- something neither you or I can see -- caused this to escalate to a tragic ending. For those reasons I don't feel this officer should be on the streets. Edit: To clarify, my last statement doesn't necessarily mean I think he should have been convicted as I stated way back in this thread. Just not on the streets with a firearm pulling people over.

There's no point in answering the question. Despite your inferences to the contrary we can't see what's going on inside the vehicle. We can certainly see outside of the vehicle and the audio. Which you routinely ignore.

There's not unless you have x-ray vision.

Ummm...no. Go back and read my thoughts and what I've said and try again.

I can see where he is looking. I can also see that when the other officer fires in that direction he retreats. Castile is also calmly telling him he isn't reaching for his gun. There's something we are missing there. You continually make an inference that you know what that something is and seem to blindly believe what the officer is saying.

I haven't said either. The above post sums up my thoughts.

He retreated because the other cop was firing towards him. From his position he would have a decent view of what/if Mr. Castile was reaching for. Where can you see that Mr. Castile is reaching for his gun? You can't. I also can't see that he is not reaching. We can see what happened outside the car and we have the audio. Those two things tell me that this officer shouldn't be on the streets with a firearm. We also have four very biased witnesses.

You don't know that he wasn't obeying the officer's commands...