And before the 49-0 "game" none of the X-men injected themselves into Trinity threads?

ANOTHER!!!!! "For the love of GOD" thread!!!!!! All of you OUT of the sandbox and to your timeout chairs! You come out when you can act like grown men (at least we know that will be a while for some of you!) :lol::lol::lol:

 

Good to see Mattingly at QB. Seems like Brohm did good at WR.

 

I am surprised how Manual is fairing this year as well. :idunno:

Edited October 17, 201015 yr by TonyDanza

ANOTHER!!!!! "For the love of GOD" thread!!!!!! All of you OUT of the sandbox and to your timeout chairs! You come out when you act like grown men (at least we know that will be a while for some of you!) :lol::lol::lol:

 

Good to see Mattingly at QB. Seems like Brohm did good at WR.

 

I am surprised how Manual is fairing this year as well. :idunno:

 

Has to be a disappointing year for the Crimson's. No question they had one of the toughest (if not the) toughest schedule around - save for maybe T's. Wondered if they were not quite ready for such yet. Also I hear grumblings in their camp about the new Coach. Wonder if any of the M faithful would care to comment. I looked for big things from them this year as well.

Defense is banged up, and the kids are still transitioning to the new scheme. Manual ran Joe's defense for over a decade, from when he was an assistant with Mayes to taking over as head coach. Sounds like some culture change.

No. 12 Manual (3-5, 0-2) lost its second straight and continued to struggle with an injury-riddled defense that is allowing 31.9 points per game.

"We can never stop the big play," first-year coach Oliver Lucas said. "If we could just make people earn it ... but we can't get our kids to be where they need to be and have them believe in it.

"It's a trust factor. They want to revert to the old thing, to what's comfortable."

OMG, what is with the Glaser bashing on here? This is not the thread for it! Back to the game: Can anyone speculate as to whether the score was an accurate assessment of the game, if it felt closer than it was, or if it felt more lopsided than it was?

OMG, what is with the Glaser bashing on here? This is not the thread for it! Back to the game: Can anyone speculate as to whether the score was an accurate assessment of the game, if it felt closer than it was, or if it felt more lopsided than it was?

 

That can't talk. They are all in time-out. Told you it would be a while for some! :lol::lol::lol:

 

 

Did I see that Fredrick ran an interception back for a td again this week?

The score is a pretty good assesment. Manual scored on one long run, otherwise St. X defense was in control.

I saw much improvement in the Tigers, but not at the level needed to beat T yet. Disappointed overall in Manual, but did see their backs break tackles for some nice gains.

That can't talk. They are all in time-out. Told you it would be a while for some! :lol::lol::lol:

 

 

Did I see that Fredrick ran an interception back for a td again this week?

Sorry I put this part in the wrong thread.