JIM SEYMOUR # 85

I respectfully disagree. That was about as egregious a foul as I have seen all year. And, it's not a 'tit for tat' scenario.

Was he not ejected ?????

Well that may be true......but........................its the action If both players were the same size, and one did what was done here - would that make it less serious ? Please refer me to that guy who can read players minds ........😁

USC are "non-contact" fouls by definition and rule.

From the clip I saw - should have been an ejection. Intent to injure - totally uncalled for.

Nice job TP94 with the updates. Good job. Just reading this does not appear that T played a very sound game. lots of penalties - sloppy ???? Nice W regardless.

thanks for the update and clarification.

Tuff kid. I agree on the "beating." But appeared to 'bounce up" every time. His name and has he seen any V action ?

If you can take the night off -I'm sure we can get some guys to chip in for a Limo for you to bring you down for the game. 😇

Am I correct this is a 1A vs a 5A ???

Always heard good thing about previous HC. Don't recall any of these issues under his watch. Just sayin'

Good decision. Agree a bright line rule is needed and NOW WE HAVE ONE. Got it right.

I agree - that's alittle strong. Know they are tuff kids, etc - but still need some recovery.

The one time I was there a Sheriff's Helicopter landed at midfield with the Game Ball Sort of scary - lots of folks around, in THE PIT - Hoping those Blades didn't come apart Good Luck.

Good W for M. Atherton exposed ????