JIM SEYMOUR # 85

Nice Season. Congrats.

Better get focused - 2nd Season about to start...................

Think the Bearcats have it going. Think they will be fine...........

You won't believe this but sometimes Coaches can go "alittle crazy." Like: Keeping starters in when the game has long been decided - and a Key player gets hurt and is lost for the season OR ..... Team comfortably ahead - "the clock is their friend" - and instead of running the thing out they instead get cute and decide to throw the ball all over the place. Well, after a few Inc's and picks guess what - other team comes back and wins. Just sayin'

" Seven years of college down the drain"

I was only funnin'

what about 6 min quarter??????

That's good to hear/ We don't have alot of "friends" out there.......................😇

Good luck on figuring out HOW ANYTHING in JCPS works or should function. Dumpster Fire.

How would you gauge the" temperature" at this point ??

Interesting Match up.

Interesting. Thought fielding a team of eligible players would be a challenge. Guess not.

Nice - thanks for that recap.....................

Glad you clarified that...........was really wondering 🤔

Will they even be able to field a team ?????

STUPID ...STUPID ...STUPID & SAD........

Guru was spot on about "reputations". Teams (and players) get "known" for; traits, tendencies, habits, etc. It may be termed "game prep". Who is a "running team", "who is a passing team"? Any previous "game issues'? Forewarned is forearmed.

I wouldn't be surprised. Is that the sort of Role Model which should be put forward ???? Just asking .......

His first ejection was having 2 personal fouls called against him for running his mouth. It wasn't due to excessive play. You do not get ejected for a Personal Foul - unless they are deemed Flagrant. You can have several PF's Once again - USC FOULS are Non-Contact conduct. 2 USC fouls get you kicked.

I respectfully disagree. That was about as egregious a foul as I have seen all year. And, it's not a 'tit for tat' scenario.

Was he not ejected ?????

Well that may be true......but........................its the action If both players were the same size, and one did what was done here - would that make it less serious ? Please refer me to that guy who can read players minds ........😁

USC are "non-contact" fouls by definition and rule.

From the clip I saw - should have been an ejection. Intent to injure - totally uncalled for.

Nice job TP94 with the updates. Good job. Just reading this does not appear that T played a very sound game. lots of penalties - sloppy ???? Nice W regardless.