Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Fox News in general, ace and the usual suspects have bemoaned anything a poster has used a comment or video from for a loooong time and now you you want to say accept it and move on? BTW, I've stated time and again that I ignore Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck because I think they do more harm for conservatism than good. I just find it funny that two people who slam those I just mentioned want to pretend that Maddow is some bastion of honesty and journalism. :lol:

So, tell us ... when has Maddow been as off-base as you seem to think she is?

 

Give us a specific example when's she's been wrong or misleading ... and simple disagreements with your point of view don't count.

So, tell us ... when has Maddow been as off-base as you seem to think she is?

 

Give us a specific example when's she's been wrong or misleading ... and simple disagreements with your point of view don't count.

Oh, but they do with you? Huh.

 

She's been "off-base" just about daily. One merely needs to watch her show to see she's no different than the ones you so dislike.

Oh, but they do with you? Huh.

 

She's been "off-base" just about daily. One merely needs to watch her show to see she's no different than the ones you so dislike.

Give me some examples, if there are so many.

 

My problem with Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck goes much deeper than simple disagreements, and you know it.

So, tell us ... when has Maddow been as off-base as you seem to think she is?

 

Give us a specific example when's she's been wrong or misleading ... and simple disagreements with your point of view don't count.

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2009/07/24/maddow-offers-corrections-buchanans-remarks-race-misquotes-him

Give me some examples, if there are so many.

 

My problem with Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck goes much deeper than simple disagreements, and you know it.

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2010/07/21/msnbc-cherry-picks-edits-fnc-clips-claim-fnc-incited-sherrod-resignat

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2009/07/24/maddow-offers-corrections-buchanans-remarks-race-misquotes-him

Brent Bozell's organization ... now that's a bastion of unbiased reporting.

Brent Bozell's organization ... now that's a bastion of unbiased reporting.

 

Does it make it any less true? You ask for examples, I give you two of them and your only response is to attack the source because it is a conservative sight.

Does it make it any less true? You ask for examples, I give you two of them and your only response is to attack the source because it is a conservative sight.

A lot of it is in the interpretation.

 

I've watched and listened to Bozell for years ... he's not credible, period.

 

I don't go around citing and referencing websites from either side of the political spectrum, because they all have their biases and tend to go overboard. I simply don't put any stock in them.

A lot of it is in the interpretation.

 

I've watched and listened to Bozell for years ... he's not credible, period.

 

I don't go around citing and referencing websites from either side of the political spectrum, because they all have their biases and tend to go overboard. I simply don't put any stock in them.

I agree, alot of what is on newsbusters is up to interpretation but the two examples I gave are not. They state facts of what Maddow said/did.

Give me some examples, if there are so many.

 

My problem with Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck goes much deeper than simple disagreements, and you know it.

Her most recent: She incorrectly claimed that FNC coverage of the Sherrod clip had helped incite her firing.

She also suggested that FNC would never show her side of the story even though, by that time Tuesday night, several FNC shows had already informed viewers of some of the details in Sherrod’s favor. In fact, Sherrod had already been forced to resign before the O’Reilly Factor became the first FNC show to report the story. :sssh:

 

How about when she used the tragedy in earthquake-rattled Haiti to bash former President George W. Bush. Even Jon Stewart, whom I loath, ripped her for that one.

 

Last year she had asked Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers if Duke was profitable, he replied that yes, they were. What does she come back with? "Why can't you operate at a loss to make up for all the pollution your company has caused?" :eyeonyou: :ohbrother:

 

Honestly, there is no shortage of her stupid comments, misinformation, lies or misrepresentation of news. Just use Google, you'll find plenty. :lol:

 

And, no, I don't know it. Nor do I care as I'm no fan of Limbaugh, Hannity or Beck.

She also told lies about the climate change issue....

She also told lies about the climate change issue....

I'm not a bit surprised.

She also told lies about the climate change issue....

 

Link?

Her most recent: She incorrectly claimed that FNC coverage of the Sherrod clip had helped incite her firing.

She also suggested that FNC would never show her side of the story even though, by that time Tuesday night, several FNC shows had already informed viewers of some of the details in Sherrod’s favor. In fact, Sherrod had already been forced to resign before the O’Reilly Factor became the first FNC show to report the story. :sssh:

 

How about when she used the tragedy in earthquake-rattled Haiti to bash former President George W. Bush. Even Jon Stewart, whom I loath, ripped her for that one.

 

Last year she had asked Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers if Duke was profitable, he replied that yes, they were. What does she come back with? "Why can't you operate at a loss to make up for all the pollution your company has caused?" :eyeonyou: :ohbrother:

 

Honestly, there is no shortage of her stupid comments, misinformation, lies or misrepresentation of news. Just use Google, you'll find plenty. :lol:

 

And, no, I don't know it. Nor do I care as I'm no fan of Limbaugh, Hannity or Beck.

 

Two other news organizations have traced the time-line. O'Reilly states that she should resign BEFORE the decision was made and before the outcome was known.

 

The Duke energy thing is not a lie and she was being an . . . she was being snarky.

 

I googled for more lies, and I found nothing that was not opinion. "She lies about not pushing an agenda" that kind of stuff. There was a posting of Stupak's speech, but the author of the post rambled and I couldn't find where they lie was. Does FactCheck or snopes have her lies posted anywhere?

Two other news organizations have traced the time-line. O'Reilly states that she should resign BEFORE the decision was made and before the outcome was known.

 

The Duke energy thing is not a lie and she was being an . . . she was being snarky.

 

I googled for more lies, and I found nothing that was not opinion. "She lies about not pushing an agenda" that kind of stuff. There was a posting of Stupak's speech, but the author of the post rambled and I couldn't find where they lie was. Does FactCheck or snopes have her lies posted anywhere?

Oh please! Double standard.