Just trying to understand Bro... it's tough when I dip in and out of some of these threads. :thumb:

 

No problem, my friend.

Ok, after reading the first three links, I see nothing wrong or suspicious. The fact that news agencies that swing either to the right and left are not all over this should speak volumes.

 

Reading some of the comments on MLive, you see that some of the conspiracy theorist are coming out, like this one:

 

"And this proves what, exactly? More and more people are awakening to the fact that 9/11 was indeed an inside job.

If you see an 'act of terrorism' in the near future and all the 'evidence' points to Iran and thus we open another front in our 100 year war, it should be taken as evidence that things aren't what they seem.

If this well dressed man who saw to it that the terror suspect got aboard the jet was indeed a CIA, MI6 or Mossad agent, or has similar ties, he will NEVER be caught. Arm twisting will be done to make Haskell recant the story, or others will come forward and claim Haskell is clearly mistaken."

 

The fact that more and more people on that flight are not speaking out should be a clue as well.

 

At least a few things are wrong or misleading on that family blog thing, but I do not have time to read the whole thing.

On a tangent, but related, can you imagine going through life being known as the "Underwear Bomber"? :lol:

On a tangent, but related, can you imagine going through life being known as the "Underwear Bomber"? :lol:

I know how much you love Rush "Limbo" ( I listen so you don't have to...) but he is pretty funny calling this guy the "Fruit-of-Kaboom" bomber... :lol:

I know how much you love Rush "Limbo" ( I listen so you don't have to...) but he is pretty funny calling this guy the "Fruit-of-Kaboom" bomber... :lol:

 

 

:notworthy: I applaud Mr. Limbaugh for that one. Well done! :clap:

On a tangent, but related, can you imagine going through life being known as the "Underwear Bomber"? :lol:

 

Very nice! :thumb:

I'm sure Jack Bauer was on the plane and was never going to let that bomb detonate.

 

Even more very nice! :clap:

Ok, after reading the first three links, I see nothing wrong or suspicious. The fact that news agencies that swing either to the right and left are not all over this should speak volumes.

 

 

The fact that more and more people on that flight are not speaking out should be a clue as well.

 

At least a few things are wrong or misleading on that family blog thing, but I do not have time to read the whole thing.

 

If it's ok for the government to change their official story 6 times or more all while finally admitting this witness was correct about his initial statement and he won't change his story I'm not sure what to say. He thinks Dateline was forced to say his info was wrong by the government. Only now after most people don't care about it are they backing up his story while still trying to ignore him.

 

There were a few originally, but they've all changed their story. One even tried getting him to change his. Also, they would have had to notice this while at the airport. He was and is an aware traveler. I go to a bar and drink a few before boarding very late. That isn't his fault right?

 

It is a family blog and it was set up before they were on a plane that a terrorist tried to blow up. They are trying to update it as they go, but admitted up front that it was a family blog. The thing that isn't misleading about him and that the government admits is correct after calling him a liar initially is his story is now confirmed to be true in every detail but one. That will probably be admitted to be correct at some point too. Meanwhile "OUR" government has changed their official story a bunch of times.

If it's ok for the government to change their official story 6 times or more all while finally admitting this witness was correct about his initial statement and he won't change his story I'm not sure what to say. He thinks Dateline was forced to say his info was wrong by the government. Only now after most people don't care about it are they backing up his story while still trying to ignore him.

 

There were a few originally, but they've all changed their story. One even tried getting him to change his. Also, they would have had to notice this while at the airport. He was and is an aware traveler. I go to a bar and drink a few before boarding very late. That isn't his fault right?

 

It is a family blog and it was set up before they were on a plane that a terrorist tried to blow up. They are trying to update it as they go, but admitted up front that it was a family blog. The thing that isn't misleading about him and that the government admits is correct after calling him a liar initially is his story is now confirmed to be true in every detail but one. That will probably be admitted to be correct at some point too. Meanwhile "OUR" government has changed their official story a bunch of times.

 

If it's a security matter for them keeping some things under wrap for a bit then I see no problem. Some things we are better off not knowing, as us knowing means the terrorists know it as well.

 

Where are all of these links to these so-called news outlets? I would like to know who they are, and see who funds some of them. Where are the links to the stories of the people who changed there stories? I am looking for the links before they changed their stories where they include their names. How many links shows this allegation that someone asked this guy to change his story?

 

He was and is an aware traveler? If so, then why didn't he notice the man who he noticed at the gate, who now was just 6 or 7 rows in front of him on the plan? He claims he did not see him from the time he left the desk until the fire? I travel quiet a bit now, and I am telling you, if something happened at the gate as he claims, I would notice him coming on board if he was anywhere near me.

 

Again, the public has no right to know everything if knowing such information will hurt national security or an on going investigation. So, there, the government could change their story as certain information is considered declassified/ or the information would not hurt the remainder of an investigation.

If it's ok for the government to change their official story 6 times or more all while finally admitting this witness was correct about his initial statement and he won't change his story I'm not sure what to say. He thinks Dateline was forced to say his info was wrong by the government. Only now after most people don't care about it are they backing up his story while still trying to ignore him.

 

There were a few originally, but they've all changed their story. One even tried getting him to change his. Also, they would have had to notice this while at the airport. He was and is an aware traveler. I go to a bar and drink a few before boarding very late. That isn't his fault right?

 

It is a family blog and it was set up before they were on a plane that a terrorist tried to blow up. They are trying to update it as they go, but admitted up front that it was a family blog. The thing that isn't misleading about him and that the government admits is correct after calling him a liar initially is his story is now confirmed to be true in every detail but one. That will probably be admitted to be correct at some point too. Meanwhile "OUR" government has changed their official story a bunch of times.

 

The government changed the story on the 1947 Roswell crash several times. Do you think that it was an alien crash cover up? Several conspiracy believers (the "woo woo"s) certainly do.

 

To me, this falls in that category. As a matter of fact, I bet that it soon shows up on Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory tv show.

If it's a security matter for them keeping some things under wrap for a bit then I see no problem. Some things we are better off not knowing, as us knowing means the terrorists know it as well.

 

Where are all of these links to these so-called news outlets? I would like to know who they are, and see who funds some of them. Where are the links to the stories of the people who changed there stories? I am looking for the links before they changed their stories where they include their names. How many links shows this allegation that someone asked this guy to change his story?

 

He was and is an aware traveler? If so, then why didn't he notice the man who he noticed at the gate, who now was just 6 or 7 rows in front of him on the plan? He claims he did not see him from the time he left the desk until the fire? I travel quiet a bit now, and I am telling you, if something happened at the gate as he claims, I would notice him coming on board if he was anywhere near me.

 

Again, the public has no right to know everything if knowing such information will hurt national security or an on going investigation. So, there, the government could change their story as certain information is considered declassified/ or the information would not hurt the remainder of an investigation.

 

While I think I agree w/ you there still is no doubt that his story is now becoming the official story. If I were on that plane I would be just as upset as him. He has the right to know the info IMO if he was on a plane that a terrorist tried to blow up. He has the same rights as elected government officials that lie to him. If the government let this guy get on a plane and they knew he had a bomb then our government needs changed immediately.

The government changed the story on the 1947 Roswell crash several times. Do you think that it was an alien crash cover up? Several conspiracy believers (the "woo woo"s) certainly do.

 

To me, this falls in that category. As a matter of fact, I bet that it soon shows up on Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory tv show.

 

We're not going to compare these facts that are now the official government story w/ theories where so far the facts don't match the theory right? If you were in his shoes how would you feel about it?

If I were on that plane I would be just as upset as him. .

Exactly how many people were on the plane? The fact that no one else is speaking out like this guy is should be a sign too, I wish we had some background info on this guy, like what he thought of the government before all of this.

 

He has the right to know the info IMO if he was on a plane that a terrorist tried to blow up.

Not even the pilot of the plane has a "right" to know what is going on if letting him know the info would hurt any investigation. He needs to just let it all play out.

 

If a lot more people on the plane were speaking out and would not shut up like this guy, then I would say we have at least a little concern.

Exactly how many people were on the plane? The fact that no one else is speaking out like this guy is should be a sign too, I wish we had some background info on this guy, like what he thought of the government before all of this.

 

Not even the pilot of the plane has a "right" to know what is going on if letting him know the info would hurt any investigation. He needs to just let it all play out.

 

If a lot more people on the plane were speaking out and would not shut up like this guy, then I would say we have at least a little concern.

 

I think people are missing the point that this guy's "conspiracy theory" is not a theory at all. It is a factual account of what happened and even the government is now admitting it. People currently just believe what the government says and that's good enough for them. I'm terribly confused by that.

I think people are missing the point that this guy's "conspiracy theory" is not a theory at all. It is a factual account of what happened and even the government is now admitting it. People currently just believe what the government says and that's good enough for them. I'm terribly confused by that.

 

Where are the links to the things this guy said from the beginning? And where are the links to the things that the government first said, and the links where they changed their story and admitting the guy was correct? From legitimate news agencies ONLY please.

 

Just because the government changed their story on other parts, if they did (Which very well could have been kept quiet at first due to security or investigation reasons), does not mean that tomorrow the government is going to turn around and say he is correct on any remaining issues.

 

I am also waiting for links (again from legitimate news agencies) on what the others on board the plane had to say, and what they are saying now. There were 289 people on that plane, and there is only one that is upset about what was said, and being said by the government?