Ranger Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Tibbs goes for 31 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paNDA Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Nice win for Scott. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEERFAN Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Suprising margin of victory for the Eagles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paNDA Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 I don't think I have ever heard of Scott's defensive admiration but to hold SK to 39 is strong. Tibbs almost outscored them on her own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebrown5606 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Congrats to Ms. Tibbs and the Lady Eagles. Trouble all around for my Lady Pioneers. Missed a ton of shots. :isurrender: Scott did a great job pressuring the outside. Once they zero'd in on passing Tibbs the ball they were right on. Couldn't tell if Wainscott or Brown ended up leading (SK). Did not quite understand the SK defense plan. The brokenback? SK ties game at start of third. Midway in third Scott was shooting the bonus. During the entire 4th QTR they were shooting DBL bonus. Fouls were 10 - 1 at start of 4th. :idunno: Stowers was T'd in the first 3 minutes of the game by an official clear across the floor. Any insight on that? One ref was at the end of SK Bench and another standing near scorers table and the one clear across court T's? BOTTOM LINE: My ladies got whooped! Burn the tape and strap up for Conner on Friday! :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madman Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Big upset! Congrats to the Lady Eagles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Crockett Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Nice game Ms. Tibbs! Congratulations to Scott... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retropop Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Wow! No comment on whether or not the outcome of this game is an upset. The margin is the shocker. Double wow!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Bud Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Congratulations to the Lady Eagles on a big win. They go to 11-4 with the win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paNDA Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Congratulations to the Lady Eagles on a big win. They go to 11-4 with the win. Must be something magical about scoring 31. Seems like that is her point total every game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarBeyondDriven Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 I am a bit surprised at this margin. Congrats to the Scott Eagles. I look for Simon to bounce back pretty quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted January 14, 2010 Author Share Posted January 14, 2010 Congrats to Ms. Tibbs and the Lady Eagles. Trouble all around for my Lady Pioneers. Missed a ton of shots. :isurrender: Scott did a great job pressuring the outside. Once they zero'd in on passing Tibbs the ball they were right on. Couldn't tell if Wainscott or Brown ended up leading (SK). Did not quite understand the SK defense plan. The brokenback? SK ties game at start of third. Midway in third Scott was shooting the bonus. During the entire 4th QTR they were shooting DBL bonus. Fouls were 10 - 1 at start of 4th. :idunno: Stowers was T'd in the first 3 minutes of the game by an official clear across the floor. Any insight on that? One ref was at the end of SK Bench and another standing near scorers table and the one clear across court T's? BOTTOM LINE: My ladies got whooped! Burn the tape and strap up for Conner on Friday! :thumb: Regarding defense; SK is going to bring man to man regardless of their opponent. I actually thought they did a better job of putting pressure on Tibbs in the first half but they went with a smaller line-up in the second half that didn't seem to work. Are you suggesting they should have gone zone? Scott didn't take many three's but the ones they shot seemed to fall. The technical wasn't in the first three minutes of the game; it was with Scott up 28-23 in the third. Scott would go on a 12-2 run to close the quarter. Sometimes T's go in your favor, sometimes they don't. In this case, safe to say MO went to Scott. Scott's overall size (not just Tibbs) just seemed to affect SK. The outside shot wasn't going for SK and it just didn't work going inside. SK had too many shots adjusted due to Scott's size once they tried to drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paNDA Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Simon Kenton (12-3) - Wainscott 6 2 15, Brown 3 3 10, Ponzer 2 0 6, Morrison 1 1 3, Kuntz 1 0 2, Stephenson 1 0 2, Hurt 0 1 1. Totals: 14 7 39. Scott (11-4) - Tibbs 11 9 31, Kraft 4 1 10, Stinson 2 5 9, Kuhse 1 1 4, Bamforth 1 0 2, Taylor 0 1 1. Totals: 19 17 57. Simon Kenton 7 12 6 14 - 39 Scott 10 13 17 17 - 57 http://nky.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/AB/20100113/SPT0302/1140375/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted January 15, 2010 Author Share Posted January 15, 2010 Simon Kenton (12-3) - Wainscott 6 2 15, Brown 3 3 10, Ponzer 2 0 6, Morrison 1 1 3, Kuntz 1 0 2, Stephenson 1 0 2, Hurt 0 1 1. Totals: 14 7 39. Scott (11-4) - Tibbs 11 9 31, Kraft 4 1 10, Stinson 2 5 9, Kuhse 1 1 4, Bamforth 1 0 2, Taylor 0 1 1. Totals: 19 17 57. Simon Kenton 7 12 6 14 - 39 Scott 10 13 17 17 - 57 http://nky.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/AB/20100113/SPT0302/1140375/ Just read the Enquirer article...ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts