October 28, 200916 yr I've never really understood why people get so upset when the Yankees continually have a huge payroll. It's even more hilarious when these same people are Red Sox fans.
October 28, 200916 yr For most fans, it comes under the heading of "lack of a level playing field." But it is hypocritical for BoSox fans to whine about it.
October 28, 200916 yr Author Because it is ruining baseball and the reason no one watches anymore.Elaborate please.
October 28, 200916 yr Here is a post I made a little over a month ago: Exactly. The Yankees overspend and outbid for some free agents each year and pay the penalty (luxury tax) for doing so. It is the system in place. Teams in how they spent money and their rankings: NY (1), Boston (4), Detroit (5), LA Angels (6), Philly (7), LA Dodgers (9), Atlanta (11), St. Louis (13), Colorado (18), Minnesota (24). It is hard to say baseball has figured it out when 8 out of the 10 teams that have either clinched or the only ones left with a shot to make the playoffs are in the upper half of teams spending money. People can bash the Yankees for not winning titles, but the proof shows your odds are a lot better to win it all if you are willing to spend money.
October 28, 200916 yr Elaborate please. It's not only the Yanks. It's large market teams in general. Looks who was the last 4 teams in there? Small market teams really have very little chance.
October 28, 200916 yr Author For most fans, it comes under the heading of "lack of a level playing field." But it is hypocritical for BoSox fans to whine about it.I have a hard time buying this argument since the Yanks haven't been to the World Series since '03.
October 28, 200916 yr Few reasons but the most important to answer the thread title question: They have won more titles and victories than anyone else in MLB, and it is not even close. It is easy to dislike favorites.
October 28, 200916 yr Author It's not only the Yanks. It's large market teams in general. Looks who was the last 4 teams in there? Small market teams really have very little chance.I think this is a cop out excuse and the real reason is what bugatti alludes too. People are jealous of their success. Check this out: Here are the World Series participants and their payroll rank since '01 (the first year the Yanks went over $100 million). 2009: Yanks (1) vs. Phillies (7) 2008: Phillies (12) vs. Rays (29) 2007: Red Sox (2) vs. Rockies (25) 2006: Cardinals (11) vs. Tigers (14) 2005: White Sox (13) vs. Astros (12) 2004: Red Sox (2) vs. Cardinals (9) 2003: Marlins (25) vs. Yankees (1) 2002: Angels (15) vs. Giants (10) 2001: Diamondbacks (8) vs. Yankees (1) Out of 18 years half the World Series participants weren't in the top ten in pay roll. It seems like teams who aren't the big spenders have a chance. And three teams 25th or lower made the World Series as well.
October 28, 200916 yr ^ And your point 3 teams outside of the top 15 made it 3 times out of 18 teams. Not a very good ratio.
October 28, 200916 yr It's not only the Yanks. It's large market teams in general. Looks who was the last 4 teams in there? Small market teams really have very little chance. But that's the system that's in place, was put in place by MLB not large market teams. Later.
October 28, 200916 yr For most fans, it comes under the heading of "lack of a level playing field." But it is hypocritical for BoSox fans to whine about it. :thumb:
October 28, 200916 yr Author ^ And your point 3 teams outside of the top 15 made it 3 times out of 18 teams. Not a very good ratio.Look at the salaries though. After the top nine teams this year (it was ten last year) nobody spent $100 million dollars. So I'd say using the top ten as your big spenders is a much better qualifier than the top fifteen.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.