Simon Says SK 20 Conn 7

 

Conner is not good

 

Do you believe that Cooper can stay with them?

Do you believe that Cooper can stay with them?

 

I think that's for a different thread..

I think that's for a different thread..

 

Not really. It gives us his thoughts of how well they can then stay with SK.

haha, so now you are comparing Cooper to SK? Cooper vs. Conner tells you nothing about the outcome of Conner vs. SK, or vice versa. And I still don't understand how "you're right". Conner didn't actually beat any GOOD teams this year or last year. Yes, they got a win against Ryle (having a bad season) and Simon Kenton on last minute/second plays but they did not outplay them at all.

 

And as for Cooper goes I don't think people realize how much the team is just focusing on improving. Ryle and Conner think we want to have some big rivalry when we are only coming off our 2nd year and still figuring out what goes where. I'll tell you this, the score will not be 57-0.

Both of those wins were on last second plays, and they lost to SK later on in tournament play. Also that was one of Ryles worst seasons b/c there wasn't nearly as much leadership as usual.

 

Conner is not good

 

Conner is not bad. NKY 6A is improved greatly from last year, with maybe the exception of BC. Conner will not stop Sk's running game. Sk may not stop Conner's multi-attack. SK 45-35

Both of those wins were on last second plays, and they lost to SK later on in tournament play. Also that was one of Ryles worst seasons b/c there wasn't nearly as much leadership as usual.

 

Conner is not good

 

Sounds like you've got a little chip on the ol' shoulder? It's going to be a great game. Conner takes it, no question.

No it's just annoying to hear people talking about how Conner is going to have a run at state when all they have done so far is shut out teams that have been getting shut out since the beginning of time (with the exception of the teeny tiny Holy Cross)

Conner takes it, no question.

 

I have a question...

 

What makes you so confident about Conner is this game?

haha, so now you are comparing Cooper to SK? Cooper vs. Conner tells you nothing about the outcome of Conner vs. SK, or vice versa. And I still don't understand how "you're right". Conner didn't actually beat any GOOD teams this year or last year. Yes, they got a win against Ryle (having a bad season) and Simon Kenton on last minute/second plays but they did not outplay them at all.

 

And as for Cooper goes I don't think people realize how much the team is just focusing on improving. Ryle and Conner think we want to have some big rivalry when we are only coming off our 2nd year and still figuring out what goes where. I'll tell you this, the score will not be 57-0.

 

Let me see if I can keep up in la la land.

 

Conner BEAT SK last year yet they didn't beat ANY GOOD TEAMS LAST YEAR.

On paper, it says Conner WON against Simon Kenton. In reality, they did not outplay or beat them. They got a few LUCKY plays in the last minute to WIN against Simon Kenton. I would not consider that "beating". And as I already stated, Simon Kenton and Conner played in the district tournament and SK had complete control of the entire game.

 

See, I can put emphasis on words by capitalizing all of the letters too.

 

No need to be stubborn. I already know you will never see my point of view because you are narrow minded and ignorant. -- Conner gets dominated by Simon Kenton & Ryle this year.

On paper, it says Conner WON against Simon Kenton. In reality, they did not outplay or beat them. They got a few LUCKY plays in the last minute to WIN against Simon Kenton. I would not consider that "beating". And as I already stated, Simon Kenton and Conner played in the district tournament and SK had complete control of the entire game.

 

See, I can put emphasis on words by capitalizing all of the letters too.

 

No need to be stubborn. I already know you will never see my point of view because you are narrow minded and ignorant. -- Conner gets dominated by Simon Kenton & Ryle this year.

:laugh:

Okay, let me see if I've GOT this straight. If the paper says that one TEAM beat another one, we should still check WITH you to decipher the actual OUTCOME?

Some of you need to revist the rules. Feel free to start another one that stays on topic, but this one has more than run it's course.