The Drudge Report today has 3 articles about Obama and American business. They all tell of how he and his socialist supporters are going to run and ruin America's economic way of life.

 

!st is a threat to destroy an investment company because they did not play ball with Obama's view of the Chrysler bankrupcty.

 

The 2nd story is of how Obama will deal with GM after the Chrysler situation is settled.

 

The 3rd story is of how Wall Street is to be restricted.

 

I know all of the socialist supporters will give dubois reasons for all these actions. But what is happening is that these people are trying to do is take over the American way of life, so they have all the power and try to give us so called economic justice. What it will do is to destroy incentive and we will all be equal, equally poorer for the Obama power grab.

Gotta love conspiracies! :lol:

 

That and paranoia.

Do you honestly not see socialistic tendencies in the way the Obama administration is dealing with the economy?

 

During the campaign I threw the socialist moniker around as much as anyone more to get a rise out of people then in seriousness. After the way the Chrysler situation was handled with the union and the government in effect sharing ownership I'm not so sure I was wrong. Now with 60 votes in the Senate Obama can do just about anythng he wants and that's scary.

Gotta love conspiracies! :lol:

 

That and paranoia.

 

Not a conspiracy -

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/05/bankruptcy-atto.html

 

And thats not FOXNews..........

Do you honestly not see socialistic tendencies in the way the Obama administration is dealing with the economy?

 

During the campaign I threw the socialist moniker around as much as anyone more to get a rise out of people then in seriousness. After the way the Chrysler situation was handled with the union and the government in effect sharing ownership I'm not so sure I was wrong. Now with 60 votes in the Senate Obama can do just about anythng he wants and that's scary.

 

I honestly don't know if the country will recover, or what it will look like if it does.

Not a conspiracy -

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/05/bankruptcy-atto.html

 

And thats not FOXNews..........

As I read the story ... one guy makes some claims that the White House and a spokesman for the investment firm involved have both denied.

 

Right now, it's two against one ...

As I read the story ... one guy makes some claims that the White House and a spokesman for the investment firm involved have both denied.

 

Right now, it's two against one ...

 

Who do you think is going to win..................if they threatened..............

Maybe not Socialist in the manner the textbooks define, but he has certainly taken public policy in that direction.

Not a conspiracy -

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/05/bankruptcy-atto.html

 

And thats not FOXNews..........

 

So, what makes it true? Because a news agency that is not FOXNews reports "White House Denies Charge By Attorney that Administration Threatened to Destroy Investment Firm's Reputation" ?

 

I can find articles about people that believe we didn't land on the moon, either. Apples and oranges, I know, but the point is, is that an article discussing the charge doesn't make the charge true.

Who do you think is going to win..................if they threatened..............

It's going to take more than conpsiracy theories to advance this premise ... like maybe some facts.

Who do you think is going to win..................if they threatened..............

 

A conspiracy, of course!

Do you honestly not see socialistic tendencies in the way the Obama administration is dealing with the economy?

 

During the campaign I threw the socialist moniker around as much as anyone more to get a rise out of people then in seriousness. After the way the Chrysler situation was handled with the union and the government in effect sharing ownership I'm not so sure I was wrong. Now with 60 votes in the Senate Obama can do just about anythng he wants and that's scary.

 

For any complainers: Obama was elected, just as Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, etc. were. The senators and representatives were as well. So obviously they were proposing something more people wanted than didn't. If they don't get the job done, there will be ample opportunity to elect someone else in due time. It's been three months...relax!

Why don't you answer the question rather then giving a PolySci lecture?

 

And FWIW Obama was elected running as a centrist with support of moderates of both parties but has taken a hard left since his election. Maybe just maybe Obama never had any intention of governing from the center. He certainly hasn't shown any intention of doing so thus far.

 

And I still would love to hear any of the Obamites explain how the Obama deal for government ownership of Chrysler isn't at least socialistic.

And FWIW Obama was elected running as a centrist with support of moderates of both parties but has taken a hard left since his election. Maybe just maybe Obama never had any intention of governing from the center. He certainly hasn't shown any intention of doing so thus far.

The problem with that assessment is that even the center is the left to you.

Did Obama not run as a centrist?

 

Has he not governed as a hard core if not radical leftist?

 

Where is the innacuracy of my assessment?

 

And is not the government ownership of an automobile manufacturer Socialistic?