December 27, 200817 yr Dickerson in a platoon role is probably a better leadoff option, but it's doubtful that Dickerson will cut it as an everyday player. Nah ... I'm just calling it like I see it. The lifetime .331 OBP is much more meaningful than a partial season of hitting .320 ... you can be as optimistic as you want, but there's nothing about this move that helps the Reds offensively. Having a guy that lead the league in SB's last season won't help a team with little speed offensively? I find that hard to believe.
December 27, 200817 yr Author you can be as optimistic as you want, but there's nothing about this move that helps the Reds offensively. Nothing? Really? His speed on the bases brings NOTHING to the table? Funny...
December 27, 200817 yr Having a guy that lead the league in SB's last season won't help a team with little speed offensively? I find that hard to believe.About as much as his .331 OBP in the leadoff slot will hurt it.
December 27, 200817 yr Nothing? Really? His speed on the bases brings NOTHING to the table? Funny...Ask the Dodgers how much Juan Pierre helped them last season. Actually, Taveras' ability to steal bases would work better in the lower part of the order. He would be a better player, though, if he stole 20 fewer bases a year and got on base about 20 more times.
December 27, 200817 yr I'm a baseball fan ... why does it matter? It doesn't...I'm just curious thats all. No favorite team though?
December 27, 200817 yr Author Ask the Dodgers how much Juan Pierre helped them last season. I didn't realize they signed Pierre...
December 27, 200817 yr It doesn't...I'm just curious thats all. No favorite team though?Probably the Cubs, but I'm more of a baseball fan than a fan of any particular team.
December 27, 200817 yr Probably the Cubs, but I'm more of a baseball fan than a fan of any particular team. :thumb:
December 27, 200817 yr I didn't realize they signed Pierre...Other than the defense and arm, they're pretty much the same player. Look, it's not a bad signing. Taveras is a fine centerfielder, but hitting him in the leadoff spot won't do much to solve the Reds' problems scoring runs.
December 27, 200817 yr I'd also like to know exactly how much this signing is for. That plays a big part to whether its a good signing or decent signing IMO
December 27, 200817 yr Author Walt Jocketty on the Willy Taveras signing: --"He fills a couple of needs. He gives us very good defense in center field, and he's potentially a very good leadoff man." Jocketty sadi in order to do that Taveras has to get his on-base percentage close to .367 like it was in the 2007, rather than the .308 it was last season: "He needs to get back to way he was swinging the bat and getting on base a couple of years ago. Jamie Quirk, who's with us now was with Willy in Colorado, feels like Willy can get back to that." --Are the Reds still interested in Jerry Hairston Jr.? "Yes. He could end up being the left fielder if we can't get that RBI man, which might be hard to do at this point. We may have a different type of team, where we rely on speed and defense and try to manufacture runs. We've still got some guys who can hit the ball out of the ballpark -- (Joey) Votto, (Jay) Bruce and (Edwin) Encarnacion. But we're going to a little bit different kind of team." --Are the Reds still interested in Rocco Baldelli? "We'll talk some more. We're looking into the medical a little more."
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.