Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Sarah Palin--Outraged??

Featured Replies

She has taken more heat from her own party than from anyone else.
Not true. If you believe that it is, please list all of the Republicans that have applied the "heat." While you are at it, it would be great if you indicate which ones have actually every met the woman. Here, I will start the list.

 

Peggy Noonan - never met her

Chris Buckley - never met her

Kathleen Parker - never met her

David Gergen - never met her (I don't believe that he is really a Republican either)

David Gergen - never met her

 

Please feel free to add to the list.

 

If Palin finishes her term as governor as strongly as it began, she will be a contender for the 2012 nomination, the smears from the mainstream media and left wing bloggers notwithstanding. If that happens, then some of Palin's critics, including those listed above, will be jumping on her bandwagon.

  • Replies 92
  • Views 9.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
There's a difference between making a slip of the tongue during an extemporaneous remark and not being able to answer direct, straightforward questions about your qualifications (like what newspapers you read, or speaking intelligently about the proposed financial rescue package, or discussing the merits of the September 2002 Bush Doctrine.) Obama and McCain had their share of the former. Obama said he had visited "57 states", McCain stated that al Qaeda were crossing into Iran for training. Most people took these mis-statements for what they were--manifestations of long hours on the campaign trail, and not indications of genuine ignorance.

 

So H, do you believe that Palin genuinely didn't know that Africa was a continent and not a country?

The willingness of Obama supporters to dismiss well documented and troubling instances of corrumption on Obama's part while eagerly spreading gossip about Palin has been facinating. We shall see how well Obama's socialist initiatives work in an economy in recession. If raising taxes, increasing spending, driving business costs up by pandering to the unions by eliminating secret ballot requirements, and bankrupting major US industries improves the economy, then I may give socialism a second look :lol:

 

However, until then I will remain convinced that Sarah Palin has a much better understanding and appreciation of what has made America great than Obama or Biden. Socialism has been tried before - repeatedly - and it has failed - repeatedly. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

 

 

The oft-repeated references to socialism might have the alarmist effect you intended if it were not for the fact that your party's president has encouraged the takeover of insurance companies, banks, and mortgage underwriting firms, and breathlessly endorsed the $700 billion government bailout of the U.S. banking sector as part of a panicked response to his mismanagement of the financial system. The presidential candidate you supported suspended his campaign to ensure passage of the latter. Of course, we don't really know where Sarah Palin stood on this--as she was never able to summon an intelligible statement on the subject. But she did manage, in the scant time she's been in charge of Alaska's affairs, to raise taxes on big oil and increase state spending levels significantly.

So H, do you believe that Palin genuinely didn't know that Africa was a continent and not a country?

 

 

Based on the limited unscripted instances where she spoke of her knowledge of foreign affairs topics, it is certainly plausible.

The oft-repeated references to socialism might have the alarmist effect you intended if it were not for the fact that your party's president has encouraged the takeover of insurance companies, banks, and mortgage underwriting firms, and breathlessly endorsed the $700 billion government bailout of the U.S. banking sector as part of a panicked response to his mismanagement of the financial system. The presidential candidate you supported suspended his campaign to ensure passage of the latter. Of course, we don't really know where Sarah Palin stood on this--as she was never able to summon an intelligible statement on the subject. But she did manage, in the scant time she's been in charge of Alaska's affairs, to raise taxes on big oil and increase state spending levels significantly.
Nice try, but I am not a Republican, I am a conservative. I have never defended Bush's spending and I do not support the bail out. As for raising taxes on big oil, Palin nixed the sweetheart deals that her corrupt predecessor cut with the companies. The large jump in revenues resulted mostly from the soaring price of crude oil and instead of growing government, Palin sent to surplus to the taxpayers. Constant efforts to disparage Palin's sparkling record in Alaska may fool liberals but conservatives are not buying it.

 

The fact is Sarah Palin will not become president in January but Obama will. What will Democrats do when the public grows weary of the attacks on Palin and finally focuses on the socialist agenda of Barack Obama? I am anxious to see how raising taxes during a recession works out for The One.

 

Americans will finally be focused on Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi soon and few people will be interested in anonymous smears against an outstanding Alaskan governor.

Obviously, some people are determined to perpetuate the myths about Sarah Palin, regardless of the facts.

 

From Rich Lowry:

 

I talked to Steve Biegun, the former Bush NSC aid who briefed Sarah Palin on foreign policy, and he considers the leaks against her on the international stuff "absurd."

 

He says there's no way she didn't know Africa was a continent, and whoever is saying she didn't must be distorting "a fumble of words." He talked to her about all manner of issues relating to Africa, from failed states to the Sudan. She was aware from the beginning of the conflict in Darfur, which is followed closely in evangelical churches, and was aware of Clinton's AIDS initiative. That basically makes it impossible that she thought all of Africa was a country.

 

On not knowing what countries are in NAFTA, Biegun was part of the conversation that led to that accusation and it convinces him "somebody is acting with a high degree of maliciousness." He was briefing Palin before a Univision interview, and talking to her about trade issues. He rolled through NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Colombia FTA. As he talked, people were coming in and out of the room, handing Palin things, etc. She was distracted from what Biegun was saying, and said, roughly, "Ok, who's in NAFTA, what's the deal with CAFTA, what's up the FTA?"—her way, Biegun says, of saying "rack them and stack them," begin again from the start. "Somebody is taking a conversation and twisting it maliciously," he says. - more

  • Author
The Obama gaffe was reported, and everyone knows it was simply a mistake. The people talking badly about Palin are not democrats, they ar the McCain people, some were her handlers. The big report is not really whether or not Palin knew these things, but the backbiting that is taking place.

 

Are you really that naive to believe that the "unnamed sources" could be from either side, or simply made up to promote an agenda?? My common sense tells me the Dems are very fearful of Palin for some reason?? Why would they and their mouthpieces in the media try so hard to destroy this alledged "simpleton from Alaska"?? Is it possible they're actually concerned that someone from outside the mainstream might actually connect with Americans with common sense talk, and a consistant message, even without a teleprompter??

So you don't think taking on corruption in your own party is significant?

 

 

(and WINNING, BTW)

 

Good point, she won against a person who had been involved in corruption. Alaska people must have been desperate for anyone.

Good point, she won against a person who had been involved in corruption. Alaska people must have been desperate for anyone.
Sarah Palin did not simply run against an unpopular corrupt governor, she was instrumental in exposing the corruption in Murkowski's administration that made him unpopular. That is a distinction that liberals just do not seem to get. In addition, her efforts led to the resignation of the GOP Chairman from the energy commission, who was also forced to pay a $12,000 fine, and the resignation of Alaska's Attorney General. It was those efforts that put her into position to run against and easily defeat an incumbent governor and a former Democratic governor.

 

Sarah Palin did not just get lucky to run against an unpopular governor she made that luck happen.

Are you really that naive to believe that the "unnamed sources" could be from either side, or simply made up to promote an agenda?? My common sense tells me the Dems are very fearful of Palin for some reason?? Why would they and their mouthpieces in the media try so hard to destroy this alledged "simpleton from Alaska"?? Is it possible they're actually concerned that someone from outside the mainstream might actually connect with Americans with common sense talk, and a consistant message, even without a teleprompter??

 

 

 

:laugh: Why on earth would anyone be fearful of her? She had her time and it didn't work out. She was not even close to being ready for the kinda stage she was on. I'm pretty sure she's gone as far in politics as she's going to go.

:laugh: Why on earth would anyone be fearful of her? She had her time and it didn't work out. She was not even close to being ready for the kinda stage she was on. I'm pretty sure she's gone as far in politics as she's going to go.
:laugh: A poll of Republicans indicates that 64 percent believe Sarah Palin will be the leading candidate for the Republican nomination in 2012. Not only are Democrats scared of her, as evidenced by the vicious media smears, but other Republicans also understand her appeal.

 

Mike Huckabee was runner up in the poll with 12 percent of the votes. Five other governors followed him.

The same could be said for Obama. Based on his ridiculous performance on the campaign trail, it can also be said of Vice President-elect Joe Gaffe. :lol:

 

Uh.....He won.

:laugh: A poll of Republicans indicates that 64 percent believe Sarah Palin will be the leading candidate for the Republican nomination in 2012. Not only are Democrats scared of her, as evidenced by the vicious media smears, but other Republicans also understand her appeal.

 

Mike Huckabee was runner up in the poll with 12 percent of the votes. Five other governors followed him.

 

A woman President, HA, that'll be the day.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.