August 24, 200818 yr Is there any doubt that these two are about as anti-gun as they come? Have a listen to Biden.
August 24, 200818 yr McCain isn't a gun friendly as you would think. http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2008/01/mccains_stand_on_oregon_gun_bi.html
August 24, 200818 yr Author McCain isn't a gun friendly as you would think. http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2008/01/mccains_stand_on_oregon_gun_bi.html Come on Fletch, there is no comparison between McCain and Obama/Biden. Even the NRA would rather have McCain over these two.
August 24, 200818 yr Obama's stance on guns offers something for everybody to like. He supports Americans' Second Amendment rights AND he supports the right of local governments to deny those rights. Who can disagree with both of those positions?:lol:
August 24, 200818 yr Obama's stance on guns offers something for everybody to like. He supports Americans' Second Amendment rights AND he supports the right of local governments to deny those rights. Who can disagree with both of those positions?:lol: Based on their most rcent decision, the conservatives on the United States Supreme Court agree with Senator Obama.
August 24, 200818 yr Based on their most rcent decision, the conservatives on the United States Supreme Court agree with Senator Obama.:lol: Obama supported the DC handgun ban. The case reached the US Supreme Court and the court ruled against the hand gun ban. Obama then said he agreed with the court's decision. Among true supporters of the Second Amendment, Obama's positions are about as inconsistent as humanly possible. Maybe they are reconcilable with one another in a parallel universe.
August 24, 200818 yr Author Based on their most rcent decision, the conservatives on the United States Supreme Court agree with Senator Obama.Tell me, do you think Obama or Biden are pro-gun?
August 24, 200818 yr Author As the NRA very candidly expresses, the 2008 election will determine who controls: U.S. participation in the anti-gun United Nations; Appointments to the federal courts, including the critical U.S. Supreme Court; The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which the Brady Campaign now insists should ban firearms in every place of employment in America; The Department of State, which could give credence and funding to the world gun-ban efforts of Rebecca Peters’ International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA). The State Department could negotiate a U.N. global gun-ban treaty that would violate American sovereignty; The U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, which could force huge changes on hunters and gun owners; The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which today is being petitioned to ban lead bullets for hunting, even in the ubiquitous .22 rimfire; The Environmental Protection Agency, which could conceivably close down shooting ranges throughout the country.
August 24, 200818 yr As the NRA very candidly expresses, the 2008 election will determine who controls: U.S. participation in the anti-gun United Nations; Appointments to the federal courts, including the critical U.S. Supreme Court; The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which the Brady Campaign now insists should ban firearms in every place of employment in America; The Department of State, which could give credence and funding to the world gun-ban efforts of Rebecca Peters’ International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA). The State Department could negotiate a U.N. global gun-ban treaty that would violate American sovereignty; The U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, which could force huge changes on hunters and gun owners; The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which today is being petitioned to ban lead bullets for hunting, even in the ubiquitous .22 rimfire; The Environmental Protection Agency, which could conceivably close down shooting ranges throughout the country. WOW!! And you guys think that the global warming crowd is alarmist. Can we assume that the Bush administration is anti-gun? They didn't withdraw from the United Nations. Can you show me where the Obama campaign has backed the NRA's scare proposals?
August 24, 200818 yr Author WOW!! And you guys think that the global warming crowd is alarmist. Can we assume that the Bush administration is anti-gun? They didn't withdraw from the United Nations. Can you show me where the Obama campaign has backed the NRA's scare proposals? Who said anything about withdrawing? I think you're a bit confused there. I have posted Obama's anti-gun record more than once, it's there if you just look. There is nothing alarmist about being concerned about who is control of making changes in laws that will affect gun owners. You're simply trying to spin this into the usual Democrat talking points. Need I remind you that Biden penned the Clinton Gun Ban that Obama and Biden want to resurrect? You never answered my question, do you think Obama/Biden are pro-gun?
August 24, 200818 yr Come on Fletch, there is no comparison between McCain and Obama/Biden. Even the NRA would rather have McCain over these two. Exactly, Obama/Biden is anti gun as there has ever been (and that is a statement in itself considering some). I don't understand any gun owner or anyone that loves our freedoms and rights in this country ever voting for this ticket. This (Obama/Biden) is imo the (G.C.S.) "Government Contolled Society" ticket.
August 24, 200818 yr Exactly, Obama/Biden is anti gun as there has ever been (and that is a statement in itself considering some). I don't understand any gun owner or anyone that loves our freedoms and rights in this country ever voting for this ticket. This (Obama/Biden) is imo the (G.C.S.) "Government Contolled Society" ticket. I don't understand how you can imply that the OJ ticket is for GCS, when McCain heavily supported the Patriot Act; the biggest infringement on our constitutional rights to this day.
August 24, 200818 yr I've never understood why Republicans want to cut funding for police officers and make it easier for criminals to get guns. My cousin's police union is backing Obama because they plan on restoring the COPS grants that put officers on the streets and schools when Clinton was in office. Bush got in office and those resources went overseas and police funding got cut. I'm curious to hear a Republican take on why it's OK to reduce funding for police officers yet make it easier for the criminals to get assault weapons.
August 24, 200818 yr Author I'm perfectly fine with an Anti-Gun ticket.That's sad. How many other of our freedoms do you find it OK to have threatened?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.