August 19, 200818 yr He'll be arrested by Week 8. Maybe, but if and it is a huge IF, he is able to stay out of trouble, the bengals will have the most explosive passing game in the NFL with CJ, TJ, Henry, and Utecth.
August 19, 200818 yr Maybe, but if and it is a huge IF, he is able to stay out of trouble, the bengals will have the most explosive passing game in the NFL with CJ, TJ, Henry, and Utecth. The Bengals will win 6-7 games, and the "if" with Chris Henry isn't very big, IMO.
August 19, 200818 yr The Bengals will win 6-7 games, and the "if" with Chris Henry isn't very big, IMO. If they have Henry, along with the other receivers, and Rudi, and Perry, along with some descent defense, honestly I could see the Bengals winning ten games easily.
August 19, 200818 yr If they have Henry, along with the other receivers, and Rudi, and Perry, along with some descent defense, honestly I could see the Bengals winning ten games easily. @ Baltimore Tennessee @ NYG Cleveland @ Dallas @ NYJ Pittsburgh Jacksonville @ Houston Philadelphia @ Pittsburgh Baltimore @ Indy Washington @ Cleveland Kansas City Just curious, which 10 games would they win?
August 19, 200818 yr Author @ Baltimore------W Tennessee--------W @ NYG------------L Cleveland---------W @ Dallas----------L @ NYJ------------W Pittsburgh---------L Jacksonville--------L @ Houston--------W Philadelphia -------W @ Pittsburgh-------L Baltimore----------W @ Indy------------L Washington-------W @ Cleveland-------W Kansas City--------W Just curious, which 10 games would they win? I count 10 but they could steal 1 of the games against the Steelers Edited August 19, 200818 yr by 00Rocket28 I'm an idiot
August 19, 200818 yr The Bengals will win 6-7 games, and the "if" with Chris Henry isn't very big, IMO. They were 5-3 last year with Henry, The offenses is clearly better with him on the field, It allows single coverage for Chad and TJ, say yes it is a big "if". With or without Henry, the passing game is way to good to only win 6 games, I can see them winning anywhere from 8 to 11 games.
August 19, 200818 yr Clevelands 1st team defense didn't look very good at all tonight and I think Anderson is a 1 year wonder, I can see them easily taking a step back just like the Bengals did after they won the division.
August 19, 200818 yr So my next question is, what changes have been made on the defensive side of the ball to take the Bengals from 7-9 to 10-6? From what I've seen so far they cant tackle to save their lives.
August 19, 200818 yr It sounds like a bad idea, but I mean if we bring him back and he stays out of trouble, big if there, that gives us three of the top 15 or 20 wideouts in the land maybe plus simpson, caldwell and maxwell. High risk high reward, but if he gets in trouble again, wow. Along with one of the top 5-8 TE possibly, as well.... And two pretty good RB's. I think our QB is supposed to be good too. Hmmm starting to think about what got Cinci to the playoffs a few years ago, sure take aways helped, but let's face it, the Offense got us to that point.
August 19, 200818 yr Along with one of the top 5-8 TE possibly, as well.... And two pretty good RB's. I think our QB is supposed to be good too. Hmmm starting to think about what got Cinci to the playoffs a few years ago, sure take aways helped, but let's face it, the Offense got us to that point. Utecht is a top 5-8 TE?
August 19, 200818 yr So my next question is, what changes have been made on the defensive side of the ball to take the Bengals from 7-9 to 10-6? From what I've seen so far they cant tackle to save their lives. Well for starters it is a whole lot more healthier and the secondary is improved, Geathers and Odom will be able to put pressure on the QB. There problem will be stopping the run, but If the offense is as good as it should be, they will force a lot of people to pass more than they would like with all the scoring they will be doing. I agree though, if the offense doesn't play well, they will be in some trouble. Last years defense was on the field over 35 minutes a game, that is way to long for any defense for to be effective.
August 19, 200818 yr Utecht is a top 5-8 TE? I was kind of wondering about that myself. :confused: Has a lot to do with the Bengals having zero quality TEs since the Rodney Holman days, I guess, so it makes a serviceable lump of coal shimmer like a diamond in some fans' eyes.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.