AcesFull Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 I like to be able to make my own interpretation based on what the candidate actually said. Nothing more, nothing less.As I have done myself. Nothing more and nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nWo Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Question, I can see the right to defend oneself as inherent. Now, the means by which one is able to do so is what's at debate. I don't believe that "guns" are an inherent right. It's a means by which one chooses to exercise the right, but not the inherent right in and of itself. Good point. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHSDad Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Ok, OR...now where did Obama say that he wants to take away anyone's Bible, including his own? I got an email from my chain letter friends that said Obama is going to replace all the Bibles with Qurans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatz Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 I got an email from my chain letter friends that said Obama is going to replace all the Bibles with Qurans. :laugh: Sad but :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearsay Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 So...he did NOT say that people should cling to the government. OK, then, have it your way. Not enough to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt perhaps, but I submit enough to find against him by a preponderance of evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True blue (and gold) Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 I got an email from my chain letter friends that said Obama is going to replace all the Bibles with Qurans. Well, there's all the proof we need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True blue (and gold) Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 OK, then, have it your way. Not enough to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt perhaps, but I submit enough to find against him by a preponderance of evidence. Hearsay, Hearsay, Hearsay...you mean to tell me you lied (under BGP) oath when you said that he said that? :lol: Now really...this juror wants to draw my own conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts