June 22, 200818 yr http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/21/AR2008062101825.html?hpid=topnews I don't guess the others would admit it.
June 22, 200818 yr And if The Straight Talk Express goes down in flames, the outcry will be that he couldn't carry the "faithful to our spouse" bloc.
June 22, 200818 yr And if The Straight Talk Express goes down in flames, the outcry will be that he couldn't carry the "faithful to our spouse" bloc. No, it'll be more like - Dear God please help us!
June 22, 200818 yr http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/21/AR2008062101825.html?hpid=topnews I don't guess the others would admit it. You think it is more than 3 in 10? I was thinking 30% is close, but I guess "bias" can be different.
June 22, 200818 yr You think it is more than 3 in 10? I was thinking 30% is close, but I guess "bias" can be different. My young friend "Bias" works both ways. My guess many will vote for a certain candidate simply because his is a certain race, and my guess is that percentage is even larger than 30%. I can remember when JFK ran for President, and most Catholics regardless if they like his policies or not, simply voted for him because he and they were both Catholics. Personally I will vote based on whom I think will lead our Country the best, regardless of their race.
June 22, 200818 yr Author My young friend "Bias" works both ways. My guess many will vote for a certain candidate simply because his is a certain race, and my guess is that percentage is even larger than 30%. I can remember when JFK ran for President, and most Catholics regardless if they like his policies or not, simply voted for him because he and they were both Catholics. Personally I will vote based on whom I think will lead our Country the best, regardless of their race. :thumb:
June 22, 200818 yr Why not say that 7 in 10 (or 70%) don't express this bias? Oh yeah, that wouldn't be nearly as inflamatory.
June 22, 200818 yr Why not say that 7 in 10 (or 70%) don't express this bias? Oh yeah, that wouldn't be nearly as inflamatory. :thumb:
June 22, 200818 yr Author Why not say that 7 in 10 (or 70%) don't express this bias? Oh yeah, that wouldn't be nearly as inflamatory. If you are referring to me then I'm need top say that I'm not the one who made the article but if you are referring to CNN then I agree. :thumb:
June 23, 200818 yr I'm only biased when trying to talk to someone with a doo rag, hat turned sideways, saggy pants, oversized shirt with a deceased rapper on the front and chewing on a straw.
June 23, 200818 yr I'm only biased when trying to talk to someone with a doo rag, hat turned sideways, saggy pants, oversized shirt with a deceased rapper on the front and chewing on a straw. I'm sure you run into that stereotype all the time on the mean streets of Lexington. Don't forget the corn rows and tattoos!
June 23, 200818 yr I'm sure you run into that stereotype all the time on the mean streets of Lexington. Don't forget the corn rows and tattoos! You'd be surprised how many guys like that come into my store and ask for a job.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.