February 28, 200818 yr Historically, Kentucky is usually a blue state. Some years it's really hard to balance out the Louisville and NKY areas. :D
February 28, 200818 yr Historically, Kentucky is usually a blue state. Kentucky has voted Republican in 8 of the last 12 presidental elections.
February 28, 200818 yr Kentucky has voted Republican in 8 of the last 12 presidental elections. And what about the last 20? Sorry, I just get accused by OR in college basketball of constantly widening or narrowing the scope of my timeframes to Louisville's advantage... figured I'd try that out here.
February 28, 200818 yr And what about the last 20? Sorry, I just get accused by OR in college basketball of constantly widening or narrowing the scope of my timeframes to Louisville's advantage... figured I'd try that out here. Let's just say the Dems had a nice streak going from 1932 to 1952.
February 28, 200818 yr Let's just say the Dems had a nice streak going from 1932 to 1952. That was before my new friends, the cch5432 family, moved to Kentucky and changed the balance of power. :thumb:
February 28, 200818 yr Ok, those maps really bug me, so how about a more accurate picture of how we voted. btw, Boston people are just as nice as anyone else.
February 28, 200818 yr Ok, those maps really bug me, so how about a more accurate picture of how we voted. btw, Boston people are just as nice as anyone else. That is pretty wild.
February 28, 200818 yr Historically, Kentucky is usually a blue state. We have not had many Republican Governors in the last 50 years.
February 28, 200818 yr We have not had many Republican Governors in the last 50 years. Two out of 13's a lot! :sssh:
February 28, 200818 yr Let's just say the Dems had a nice streak going from 1932 to 1952. It's changed as more of the population's become more educated.
February 28, 200818 yr In reality the blue states would fail because of lack of energy. No Coal or oil. So we would own them in a matter of years. California would be lost within 10 years, as we would forcefully take the parts we need and let the rest burn or be destroyed in mudslides. We would also take Alaska and Hawaii and return them to their native people. Honestly I would love to see this happen. No joke.
February 28, 200818 yr The problem with this scenario for the conservative country is that with no hindrances from libbies, the whole game would be utterly and completely rigged to favor business, including no minimum wage, few worker protections if any, etc. Who would be left to work the mines and the oil rigs for 100 hours a week at two bucks an hour, with no insurance or vacation? My friend Jorge knows ...
February 28, 200818 yr In reality the blue states would fail because of lack of energy. No Coal or oil. So we would own them in a matter of years. California would be lost within 10 years, as we would forcefully take the parts we need and let the rest burn or be destroyed in mudslides. We would also take Alaska and Hawaii and return them to their native people. Honestly I would love to see this happen. No joke. The conservatives would not give Alaska and Hawaii back to the native people they would want to expand on into the south Pacific. So they could have the natural resources they need. That is how that works. :sssh:
February 28, 200818 yr It's changed as more of the population's become more educated. No I don't think that is it. I think the value system of each party has switched. IMO
February 28, 200818 yr The problem with this scenario for the conservative country is that with no hindrances from libbies, the whole game would be utterly and completely rigged to favor business, including no minimum wage, few worker protections if any, etc. Who would be left to work the mines and the oil rigs for 100 hours a week at two bucks an hour, with no insurance or vacation? My friend Jorge knows ...:thumb::thumb:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.