March 27, 200719 yr Neither is 4th in the SEC East... I really hope no one was braging about UK's season. If they have I haven't seen it.
March 27, 200719 yr Trust me, I know just how your fellow fans are...:lol: My point was that if you were comparing UK's season to UL's season, I think it would be hard to take UK's over UL's...JMO. Well of course, you would have to be insane to take UK's season over UL. However it still wouldn't have been any good to most of the UK fans, and still would have wanted Tubby gone, even though the team would have shown signs of being great the next year...
March 27, 200719 yr Pitino will not return to UK. Then who is going to coach the Cardinals for him next year at Rupp.
March 27, 200719 yr they beat U of L and Indiana. Even though neither was ranked when they beat them. I would take UK's season over U of L's because if you play a harder schedule of course your more likely to lose more games. Look at UK's out of conference schedule compared to u of l's.........that part you can control. You can play an easier schedule and win more games but what does that get you. UK played UNC, UCLA, Memphis, Indiana, and UMASS which beat U of L.
March 27, 200719 yr UK Played the hardest schedule in college basketball, not very many teams are going to finish with a great record with that schedule
March 27, 200719 yr Well at least you are at peace with your "Moral Victories.".....Sometime's it takes people forever to admit that...
March 27, 200719 yr Well at least you are at peace with your "Moral Victories.".....Sometime's it takes people forever to admit that... Come on give me a break you at like UL went 30-0.
March 27, 200719 yr Come on give me a break you at like UL went 30-0. Louisville didn't have a better overall season than UK...Is that what you're trying to tell me?
March 27, 200719 yr Louisville didn't have a better overall season than UK...Is that what you're trying to tell me? No not at all. You are trying to diminish UK season against UL's like they had an outstanding one.
March 27, 200719 yr No not at all. You are trying to diminish UK season against UL's like they had an outstanding one. No Im not...But Im not going to let someone try and say that just because UK's schedule was harder, UK had a better season...How does that make sense whatsoever? :confused: Yes, UK played the hardest schedule in the country, but what do they have to show for it? Maybe if UK wants to have better seasons, they should back down on scheduling the "Big Dogs," since it seems they had a little trouble with them last year...
March 27, 200719 yr No Im not...But Im not going to let someone try and say that just because UK's schedule was harder, UK had a better season...How does that make sense whatsoever? :confused: Yes, UK played the hardest schedule in the country, but what do they have to show for it? Maybe if UK wants to have better seasons, they should back down on scheduling the "Big Dogs," since it seems they had a little trouble with them last year... :lol: :lol: This isn't even my argument I don't know why I got in it.
March 27, 200719 yr what im saying is neither had a great season and your acting like u of l went 30-0 and kentucky went 0-30 saying they had a way better season,,, U of L even had home court advantage during the tourney(you might as well say) and lost to a good Texas A&M team...... I think most will agree Kansas is a 3 times better team then A&M
March 27, 200719 yr what im saying is neither had a great season and your acting like u of l went 30-0 and kentucky went 0-30 saying they had a way better season,,, U of L even had home court advantage during the tourney(you might as well say) and lost to a good Texas A&M team...... I think most will agree Kansas is a 3 times better team then A&M Show me where I said UL had a WAY better season than UK and I'll shut up...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.