March 9, 200719 yr It's pretty close to that. On the bubble last week and 5 seed this week.:jump: I do not think UK has been on the bubble but talk of a 5 seed is way ahead of ourselves.
March 9, 200719 yr I might drop 18% and go with bi-polar... That's classic!!:lol: :lol: :lol: I think I'll adopt that one as well.
March 9, 200719 yr I do not think UK has been on the bubble but talk of a 5 seed is way ahead of ourselves. It was only there if they didn't get to 20 and lost today. No way to avoid the bubble there. The Georgia win locked them in and yes they are playing for a seed. It's just not going up a full line with every win. Silly to suggest...
March 9, 200719 yr It was only there if they didn't get to 20 and lost today. No way to avoid the bubble there. The Georgia win locked them in and yes they are playing for a seed. It's just not going up a full line with every win. Silly to suggest... I agree. Maybe moving up a half line with each win, or maybe less. I think UK has a range of about 2 to 3 seed lines. Highest a 5 lowest a 7/8.
March 9, 200719 yr As I look on right now, winning this league isn't saying a whole lot... It would say a ton for Kentucky. They've been struggling ya know. A championship would boost their confidence, regardless of how tough the league is.
March 9, 200719 yr Very poor thinking process. It's not that easy to erase their finish to the regular season... Im not getting my hopes up, but the conference tournaments last year had a big implication on the seeding process.
March 9, 200719 yr Give me a 6, 7, 10 or 11 and I'm ready to roll. Don't want the 8/9 game. After the top 6 or so teams it is really a crap shoot...not a lot of difference between the 4-10 seeds.
March 9, 200719 yr Give me a 6, 7, 10 or 11 and I'm ready to roll. Don't want the 8/9 game. After the top 6 or so teams it is really a crap shoot...not a lot of difference between the 4-10 seeds. It's not like the top 6 teams are playing all that well either...
March 9, 200719 yr At this point I would not be surprised to see anyone 12(seed) and under win the whole thing.
March 9, 200719 yr At this point I would be surprised to see anyone 12(seed) and under win the whole thing. I am guessing there is supposed to be a not between would and be... And I agree. It is WIDE open. I am going to be in the city with lots of neon in the desert next Thursday through Sunday and picking winners is going to be extremely difficult.
March 9, 200719 yr It's not like the top 6 teams are playing all that well either... True, but you want to avoid them as long as you can.
March 9, 200719 yr True, but you want to avoid them as long as you can. I'd say it's better to get them before they get on a roll. At least one #1 is gone in round 2. Maybe more...
March 9, 200719 yr I am guessing there is supposed to be a not between would and be... And I agree. It is WIDE open. I am going to be in the city with lots of neon in the desert next Thursday through Sunday and picking winners is going to be extremely difficult. Yeah thats it. :lol: It is going to be tough picking the winners of the games.
March 9, 200719 yr I think a lot of people are sleeping on Memphis. They have gone under the radar a little bit IMO even though they are ranked #5. I know it sounds kind of crazy but I think this team is looking better than anyone right now.
March 9, 200719 yr I think a lot of people are sleeping on Memphis. They have gone under the radar a little bit IMO even though they are ranked #5. I know it sounds kind of crazy but I think this team is looking better than anyone right now. Easy to look good playing garbage. The talent is impressive, but we'll see. Wake up 114-111 on Tech with 22.7 left. Stupid... :lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.