It's water vapor.

Read the quesion wrong. i thought you were asking what is our biggest contribution to greenhouse gases. Water vapor does make up the largest part of greenhouse gases. We have no direct effect on the amount of water vapor concentration, but if anthropogenic gases do in fact increase atmospheric temperatures, it would in turn lead to an increase in water vapor which would again increase the atmospheric temperature.

So the majority of the world's scientists in dozens of different disciplines have all been bought and paid for to advance a distortion of the truth? Who paid them and where did they get all that money?

 

You'll have to tell me some of your UFO theories some time. :lol:

Actually, it is not a majority of the world's scientist. The scientific community is very split on this issue.

Actually, it is not a majority of the world's scientist. The scientific community is very split on this issue.

 

Those who have an interest in discrediting global warming shine a bright spot light on any dissent within the scientific community to create the illusion of widespread disagreement. Remember that story that surfaced a while back about a think tank financed by ExxonMobil that was willing to pay scientists $10,000 to publish views critical of global warming evidence ( http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/02/news/companies/exxon_science/index.htm )?

 

Ha! This is kind of like Run to State's assertion in reverse! :laugh:

You didn't quite get it, but that's OK. When you're through thinking up snide remarks it'll give you time to look it up.

 

Oh come on. That was darn funny!

Well, I like to be a little less passive about what the future holds for my decendants.

It’s inevitable, nothing we can do. We’re all going to die and some day so is mother earth.

It’s inevitable, nothing we can do. We’re all going to die and some day so is mother earth.

 

Fatalist.

Well, I'm a dumb liberal (apparantly) so I thought I'd let y'all tell me what I'm supposed to think. Apparently, the fact that I've read a lot about this issue, and come to my own conclusion that I think Gore's basic premise is worthy of considering is wrong. Lord knows how I get along in this world without y'all telling me what I should think and who I should believe.

Hmmm, a little of the pot calling the kettle black there, RM. Isn't that what we have done and seem to be getting dealt the same hand?

Fatalist.

:lol:

Which would fall in the same category as HHSDad's renewable energy source, so I think you join me in the "wrong" line.

 

OK That's the funniest line in a while on here! Nice RM:p

How is this documentary any different then, than the frenzy that GWB whipped up to gain support for invading Iraq?

 

Apparently GWB got bad information from the previous administration about WMD's.

 

(At least that's the pad answer I'm using):sssh:

Hmmm, a little of the pot calling the kettle black there, RM. Isn't that what we have done and seem to be getting dealt the same hand?

 

I'm not trying to tell you who to believe, and what to believe. I am trying to convince you that Gore isn't as evil as y'all are trying to make him out to be, and to consider looking at what he's doing in comparison to what we "normal" folks are doing.

OK That's the funniest line in a while on here! Nice RM:p

 

 

Thank you!

Apparently GWB got bad information from the previous administration about WMD's.

 

(At least that's the pad answer I'm using):sssh:

 

 

I'd love to respond, but RTS told me I had to start my own thread if I wanted to talk about that.

Those who have an interest in discrediting global warming shine a bright spot light on any dissent within the scientific community to create the illusion of widespread disagreement. Remember that story that surfaced a while back about a think tank financed by ExxonMobil that was willing to pay scientists $10,000 to publish views critical of global warming evidence ( http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/02/news/companies/exxon_science/index.htm )?

 

Ha! This is kind of like Run to State's assertion in reverse! :laugh:

You mean like the UCS?

 

You know, I listened to a radio program last week that had a Climatologist as a guest that stated that he tried to be a guest on NPR to discuss global warming and they seemed interested, until he told them he would be bringing the opposing viewpoint to the debate.....

They told him they weren't interested. :confused: :creepy:

I'm not trying to tell you who to believe, and what to believe. I am trying to convince you that Gore isn't as evil as y'all are trying to make him out to be, and to consider looking at what he's doing in comparison to what we "normal" folks are doing.

I don't think he's evil, just a politician, but then again.....

I find him more of a bumbling politician at that, but I really do think he's doing this for personal and political gain.