January 9, 200719 yr ^ Exactly my thoughts....do you think we can get his kids to Shamrock City. Sure. Kragthorpe is an offensive minded coach, just like Petrino. I'm sure he will get a tour by Rick while showing him a house. In fact, don't be surprised if the new coach commits to a luxury suite at Marshall.:sssh:
January 9, 200719 yr Nope, BCS bowl in Miami Wake.:sssh: Admit it - the Cardinal fan base is very nervous right about now.
January 9, 200719 yr Admit it - the Cardinal fan base is very nervous right about now.About our national title future? We're worried that it might be a little later than we'd been hoping. About beating UK? I know I'm not.
January 9, 200719 yr About our national title future? We're worried that it might be a little later than we'd been hoping. About beating UK? I know I'm not. I'd be nervous about losing the coach, the best players, and the recruits.
January 9, 200719 yr About beating UK? I know I'm not. UK beating Louisville next year would not be surprising at all to anyone without blinders on, especially if Brohm and Bush are gone.
January 9, 200719 yr I'd be nervous about losing the coach, the best players, and the recruits. As for myself: Both nervous AND excited about the new coach. We had Bush for one easy win this year, so losing Brohm is a bit of a gut buster, but Hunter proved he can play the position well, even if he's not quite Brohm. Still not shaking. The recruits are probably my biggest concern, but still, seeing a new coach into a HOT program that still has a great team should provide us with an acceptable class. We hit a bump, not a roadblock. I'm still hoping to get some season tickets.
January 9, 200719 yr UK beating Louisville next year would not be surprising at all to anyone without blinders on, especially if Brohm and Bush are gone. ERRRRR. You can accuse me of blinders all you want, UofL still has too much in the trenches and some good weapons offensively to lose to UK. Even with the return of Burton (GO KEENAN!!, btw) and the almighty Woodson. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a good game, but I REALLY don't see UK winning this, home game or not.
January 9, 200719 yr ERRRRR. You can accuse me of blinders all you want, UofL still has too much in the trenches and some good weapons offensively to lose to UK. Even with the return of Burton (GO KEENAN!!, btw) and the almighty Woodson. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a good game, but I REALLY don't see UK winning this, home game or not. I'm not saying UK will win, I'm saying I won't be surprised if they do...also, without Brohm and Bush, UK has more offensive weapons than UL...
January 9, 200719 yr UK beating Louisville next year would not be surprising at all to anyone without blinders on, especially if Brohm and Bush are gone.Louisville proved they didn't need Bush to dominate UK in the second half this year. And Brohm didn't exactly set that game on fire. I know it must hurt to think about that game, but here are some factoids: Louisville will return 3 players that outrushed UK's ENTIRE TEAM (Allen, Stripling, and WR Harry Douglas) and 2 players that scored rushing TDs. No UK player scored on the ground this past September. This doesn't even include Brock Bolen's soft-hands TD snag. UK was 2-12 on 3rd down against Louisville. They managed only 8 first downs all game, even though Andre Woodson threw for 231 yards; this was because he only completed 9 of 24 passes. If it wasn't a long bomb, Woodson couldn't move the offense. Louisville had a staggering 31 first downs, and rang up over 600 yards of offense. UK didn't even sack Brian Brohm once.
January 9, 200719 yr I'm not saying UK will win, I'm saying I won't be surprised if they do...also, without Brohm and Bush, UK has more offensive weapons than UL... Not to take away from Woodson's improvement this year, but I'd still take Cantwell. Urrutia over Buuurr... nah, I can't say that. I'd take UofL's returning RB's over UKs as well. Plus, with as good as the weapons as they'll have, UK's offensive line is going to have to be something special this off season to protect those guys. Best of luck to UK next season! But, without fear I say GO CARDS!!!
January 9, 200719 yr I'm not saying UK will win, I'm saying I won't be surprised if they do...also, without Brohm and Bush, UK has more offensive weapons than UL...:lol: No they don't. Call WRs a wash if you want, although I don't think they are. Louisville's running game, even without Bush, demonstrated it's superiority this year...:ylsuper:
January 9, 200719 yr Louisville proved they didn't need Bush to dominate UK in the second half this year. And Brohm didn't exactly set that game on fire. I know it must hurt to think about that game, but here are some factoids: Louisville will return 3 players that outrushed UK's ENTIRE TEAM (Allen, Stripling, and WR Harry Douglas) and 2 players that scored rushing TDs. No UK player scored on the ground this past September. This doesn't even include Brock Bolen's soft-hands TD snag. UK was 2-12 on 3rd down against Louisville. They managed only 8 first downs all game, even though Andre Woodson threw for 231 yards; this was because he only completed 9 of 24 passes. If it wasn't a long bomb, Woodson couldn't move the offense. Louisville had a staggering 31 first downs, and rang up over 600 yards of offense. UK didn't even sack Brian Brohm once. You keep starting all your arguments with last year. You should know better than that. Everyone but you realizes UK is much better now than early last season...from their QB all the way to their defense. If you want to make a valid argument, it will have to be that UL brings enough to Lexington next year to come out with a win...and that's not even close to being a given...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.