Florida

Michigan

Louisville

Notre Dame/LSU -will be happy either way as long as its a good game

Boise State - I guess :confused:

 

Who do you guys want to win?

Haters so far.

I don't see the "whoever is playing the SEC button"? :confused:

Florida

USC

LSU

Louisville

Oklahoma

I don't see the "whoever is playing the SEC button"? :confused:

 

You have done nothing but cry for the past 2 weeks about how UM is getting so screwed over by the BCS. Get over it dude.:cry:

I don't see the "whoever is playing the SEC button"? :confused:

 

Or a "I don't care, I'm just going to whine" button...

 

Im for:

Florida

Michigan

Louisville

LSU

Oklahoma

Or a "I don't care, I'm just going to whine" button...

 

Thats probably more accurate.

You have done nothing but cry for the past 2 weeks about how UM is getting so screwed over by the BCS. Get over it dude.:cry:

It's just amazing to me that UM CLEARLY was USC's top competition for the NC game, as per last weeks discussions. Now SC loses and suddenly a sloppy win over Ark. puts Florida in the mix? I could have accepted SC getting in, not liked it, but accepted it. This is just silly. But in SEC country, it's tough to convince anyone that the SEC doesn't deserve anything.

Or a "I don't care, I'm just going to whine" button...

 

Im for:

Florida

Michigan

Louisville

LSU

Oklahoma

I do care. I want everyone to see the SEC for the fraud that it is. That's why I want the Big 10 to win their bowl games against them. No whining, I just want to see the two best teams in the NC game. Once again, the BCS screwed that up.

Or a "I don't care, I'm just going to whine" button...

:lol: :lol: :lol:

It's just amazing to me that UM CLEARLY was USC's top competition for the NC game, as per last weeks discussions. Now SC loses and suddenly a sloppy win over Ark. puts Florida in the mix? I could have accepted SC getting in, not liked it, but accepted it. This is just silly. But in SEC country, it's tough to convince anyone that the SEC doesn't deserve anything.

 

UM had their chance against the buckeyes and they blew it. It wouldnt be any different if they played again in Arizona. Let someone else who played teams that were just as tough and prolly tougher than the ones you played have a chance at them.

UM had their chance against the buckeyes and they blew it. It wouldnt be any different if they played again in Arizona. Let someone else who played teams that were just as tough and prolly tougher than the ones you played have a chance at them.

 

:thumb:

UM had their chance against the buckeyes and they blew it. It wouldnt be any different if they played again in Arizona. Let someone else who played teams that were just as tough and prolly tougher than the ones you played have a chance at them.

This isn't about "let someone else play". If that were the case, why not Boise St? 33 voters thought UM was better than UF before USC lost. Why does a sloppy win over Ark. change that? I'm a fan of the 2 best teams for the title, which is what the BCS is supposed to do. However, once again, they have failed.

This isn't about "let someone else play". If that were the case, why not Boise St? 33 voters thought UM was better than UF before USC lost. Why does a sloppy win over Ark. change that? I'm a fan of the 2 best teams for the title, which is what the BCS is supposed to do. However, once again, they have failed.

 

They havn't failed until FL gets blown out and Michigan wins convincingly...

They havn't failed until FL gets blown out and Michigan wins convincingly...

I think they failed if UF loses "convincingly", not necessarily blown out. I can see a 34-20 game that isn't played as close as good evidence. And I agree that UM needs to win, but convincingly? I'll bite, why?