Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

AP Top 25 - Preseason

Featured Replies

Who finishes higher Kentucky or Cincinnati?

 

Kentucky will have a better record than Cincinnati, NOT because UK is better, but because UC's schedule is really hard. UK's four non-conference games are basically lay-ups.

  • Replies 68
  • Views 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I believe UC would beat UK straight up and they have an easier schedule so I’ll go UC.

 

That isn't true actually. UK plays better teams in the SEC, obviously, but their non-conference games are lay-ups, and UC has a lot of their tougher opponents on the road. I think UC would beat UK on a neutral field as well, but I think UK ends up with a better record. In fact, I'm really confident about that -- and I'm a fan of neither one of them.

Snell and Allen were great but there's still plenty of talent there especially on the lines. 47 teams got votes in the AP poll - trust me that the players in the UK locker room will treat that as disrespectful. Coaches' poll has UK ranked 31st which I think is pretty accurate.

 

If UK needs to complete forward passes with any regularity to win games, it is a crap-shoot. I think UK gets bowl eligible because of their 4 non-conference games, but 7-5 is their absolute ceiling. How are you going to rank a team like that pre-season?

 

Their home game with the Gators (who might be a little over-ranked, to be honest) will tell the world a lot about what this Cats' team will look like. Same with the Cats' trip to South Carolina...circle those two games if you want to try and make a run into the polls this year.

That isn't true actually. UK plays better teams in the SEC, obviously, but their non-conference games are lay-ups, and UC has a lot of their tougher opponents on the road. I think UC would beat UK on a neutral field as well, but I think UK ends up with a better record. In fact, I'm really confident about that -- and I'm a fan of neither one of them.

UC has UCLA, Ohio State, UCF, Houston, and Memphis. I’m pretty confident they’ll at least go 3-2 against those 5 schools.They should win the rest of their games no problem. That gets UC to 10-2. I’d have a hard time believing UK gets to 10 wins this year.

If UK needs to complete forward passes with any regularity to win games, it is a crap-shoot. I think UK gets bowl eligible because of their 4 non-conference games, but 7-5 is their absolute ceiling. How are you going to rank a team like that pre-season?

 

Their home game with the Gators (who might be a little over-ranked, to be honest) will tell the world a lot about what this Cats' team will look like. Same with the Cats' trip to South Carolina...circle those two games if you want to try and make a run into the polls this year.

Wait you think UK is going 7-5 but will still have a better record than UC? What? There is absolutely no chance UC loses more than 5 games. I think they’d have to have multiple significant injuries to lose more than 4.

Wait you think UK is going 7-5 but will still have a better record than UC? What? There is absolutely no chance UC loses more than 5 games. I think they’d have to have multiple significant injuries to lose more than 4.

 

I have a working VENMO account. :bunny:

 

UC will be lucky to be 3-3 through the first 6 games. They will be a BEAST next year, but this year, their schedule does them no favors. Heck, Tony Pike laid out on his show one day how they "could" very easily be 1-5 through the first 6 games.

This is alarmingly similar to Petrino saying the Louisville offense would be better without Lamar.

 

Be wary.

 

Yes and no. Louisville was simply just a bad football team on both sides of the ball most of the time Lamar was there. Lamar was just so freaking good it hid a lot of their problems at basically every position.

Yes and no. Louisville was simply just a bad football team on both sides of the ball most of the time Lamar was there. Lamar was just so freaking good it hid a lot of their problems at basically every position.

 

Time will tell. I think it's a preposterous notion to think that an offensive unit loses a transformative, game-altering player... and then gets better. History suggests that there are only a few schools that can pull that off and neither Kentucky nor Louisville fit the bill.

I have a working VENMO account. :bunny:

 

UC will be lucky to be 3-3 through the first 6 games. They will be a BEAST next year, but this year, their schedule does them no favors. Heck, Tony Pike laid out on his show one day how they "could" very easily be 1-5 through the first 6 games.

There’s absolutely no chance. UCLA is not good and that games at Nippert, Ohio State is a loss, no way are they losing to Miami or Marshall those should be 3 TD blowouts. UCF is a 50/50 game. I just don’t see how you believe a team that went 11-2 last year is going to be worse this year with more talent. If UK has a better record than UC it will because UK has a program changing year and wins 10-11 games.

There’s absolutely no chance. UCLA is not good and that games at Nippert, Ohio State is a loss, no way are they losing to Miami or Marshall those should be 3 TD blowouts. UCF is a 50/50 game. I just don’t see how you believe a team that went 11-2 last year is going to be worse this year with more talent. If UK has a better record than UC it will because UK has a program changing year and wins 10-11 games.

 

UCLA is good.

I'll take Marshall and 21 for whatever amount you can type into this machine.

I don't believe UCF is a 50/50 game. Although, yes, UC can win it.

At Houston.

At Memphis.

At South Florida.

 

I like Luke a lot, and I think he is sitting on a powder keg with the Bearcats, but it won't be in 2019. 2020 they'll be a monster, to be sure.

 

I think UC is 7-5 / 6-6, I think they'd beat UK head-to-head, and I also think UK is about a 7-5 team, with 4 non-conference bunnies included.

UCLA is good.

I'll take Marshall and 21 for whatever amount you can type into this machine.

I don't believe UCF is a 50/50 game. Although, yes, UC can win it.

At Houston.

At Memphis.

At South Florida.

 

I like Luke a lot, and I think he is sitting on a powder keg with the Bearcats, but it won't be in 2019. 2020 they'll be a monster, to be sure.

 

I think UC is 7-5 / 6-6, I think they'd beat UK head-to-head, and I also think UK is about a 7-5 team, with 4 non-conference bunnies included.

UCLA is awful. UC should manhandle any CUSA team. UC went 11-2 last year. Fickell has already built the monster in Cincinnati. The monster is alive and well. If you have me even odds on both UC going 11-1 or UC going 7-5 I’m hammering 11-1 all day. I truly believe there is a better than decent chance this teams only loss is to Ohio State. UCF is the only other game where UC isn’t significantly better and I’m far from sold on Brandon Wimbush ability to step in and lead UCF the way Milton did. Right now I think the game is 50/50.

UCLA is awful. UC should manhandle any CUSA team. UC went 11-2 last year. Fickell has already built the monster in Cincinnati. The monster is alive and well. If you have me even odds on both UC going 11-1 or UC going 7-5 I’m hammering 11-1 all day. I truly believe there is a better than decent chance this teams only loss is to Ohio State. UCF is the only other game where UC isn’t significantly better and I’m far from sold on Brandon Wimbush ability to step in and lead UCF the way Milton did. Right now I think the game is 50/50.

 

Well, if you want to have some fun with this, "slide into my PM's". :lol2:

Time will tell. I think it's a preposterous notion to think that an offensive unit loses a transformative, game-altering player... and then gets better. History suggests that there are only a few schools that can pull that off and neither Kentucky nor Louisville fit the bill.

 

See I guess that is where we differ. Lamar Jackson definitely was a transformative, generational, game altering type player. He also won a Heisman, finished in top 3 in the next, a first round pick, and led his team to the playoffs as a rookie. As much as I love Benny Snell, I dont view him as a transformative, game altering player like Jackson was for Louisville. Apparently the NFL didn't view him as such either. UKs offense scheme wise was doing things like the Wildcat and such before he came on campus with other running backs having success with it too on very bad teams. Benny was very good and obviously one of the best ever for UK. With that said he also played at a time when UK was getting better at other spots. One of the things that allows a team to keep running the ball a lot is a defense being good, and getting them the ball back and not giving up a lot of points.

 

They will miss him, but their offense still has a chance to do well without him. The defense on the other hand will miss a truly game altering type defensive player in Allen.

  • Author
Well, if you want to have some fun with this, "slide into my PM's". :lol2:

 

FWIW, Bet Online has UC's win total at 6.5 for this upcoming season...

FWIW, Bet Online has UC's win total at 6.5 for this upcoming season...

Website is down. I’d lay $100 on that no problem. Easy money.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.